Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act.

The only reason I can think of as to why it might be unchargeable is because anti-zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, and I genuinely do not know enough about these laws so I am running on assumptions despite the fact I want him to get charged.

Edit: looks like I got rogue users stalking and downvoting me despite the fact I said nothing wrong, the subhuman animals must hate me for being profiction.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act.

The only reason I can think of as to why it might be unchargeable is because anti-zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, and I genuinely do not know enough about these laws so I am running on assumptions despite the fact I want him to get charged.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act; the only reason I can think of as to why it might be unchargeable is because anti-zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, and I genuinely do not know enough about these laws so I am running on assumptions despite the fact I want him to get charged.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act; the only reason I can think of as to why it might be unchargeable is because anti-zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, I genuinely do not know enough about these laws so I am running on assumptions despite the fact I want him to get charged.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act; the only reason it might be unchargeable is because anti-zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, I genuinely do not know enough about these laws so I am running on assumptions despite the fact I want him to get charged.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act; the only reason it might be unchargeable is because anti zoophilia laws may not cover what he did, I genuinely do not know.

Unfortunately for everyone, he is suspected to be an actual zoophile rather than a feral fetishist as he claimed to have literally put a lizard on his penis, and unless he is spewing bullshit like a retard then this means he has confessed to a possibly unchargeable zoophilic act; the only reason it might be unchargeable is because anti zoophilia laws may not cover what he did.