Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

My first reaction was to laugh at the protesters up bringing human rights and up dignity with regards to porn stars. The article focuses on "actresses". I doubt anyone ever cared how men were treated in the industry.

Second reaction was to

Satoshi Hamada, a member of the House of Councilors of the Party to Protect the People from NHK

I didn't know they had such a party. NHK is a vector of liberal cancer so that's good to hear.

But my main takeaway from this story is I have no idea what we're meant to take away from it. Either I skipped over the important parts or the other commenters are reading what they want into it. Besides wait times (I guess so the whores can change their minds before people find out they were whores?), what does the law do? Who's asking for it? What was the motivation? Something or someone of influence inspired Japan's legislators to care about this now all of a sudden. Sankaku is lacking important context. I don't feel like a googlin today.

208 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

My first reaction was to laugh at the protesters up bringing human rights and up dignity with regards to porn stars. The article focuses on "actresses". I doubt anyone ever cared how men were treated in the industry.

Second reaction was to

Satoshi Hamada, a member of the House of Councilors of the Party to Protect the People from NHK

I didn't know they had such a party. NHK is a vector of liberal cancer so that's good to hear.

But my main takeaway from this story is I have no idea what we're meant to take away from it. Either I skipped over the important parts or the other commenters are reading what they want into it. Besides wait times (I guess so the whores can change their minds before people find out they were whores?), what does the law do? Who's asking for it? What was the motivation? Something inspired Japan's legislators to care about this now all of a sudden. Sankaku is lacking important context. I don't feel like a googlin today.

208 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

My first reaction was to laugh at the protesters up bringing human rights and up dignity with regards to porn stars. The article focuses on "actresses". I doubt anyone ever cared how men were treated in the industry.

Second reaction was to

Satoshi Hamada, a member of the House of Councilors of the Party to Protect the People from NHK

I didn't know they had such a party. NHK is a vector of liberal cancer so that's good to hear.

But my main takeaway from this story is I have no idea what we're meant to take away from it. Either I skipped over the important parts or the other commenters are reading what they want into it. Besides wait times (I guess so the whores can change their minds before people find out they were whores?), what does the law do? Who's asking for it? What was the motivation? Sankaku is lacking important context. I don't feel like a googlin today.

208 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

My first reaction was to laugh at the protesters up bringing human rights and up dignity with regards to porn stars. The article focuses on "actresses". I doubt anyone ever cared how men were treated in the industry.

Second reaction was to

Satoshi Hamada, a member of the House of Councilors of the Party to Protect the People from NHK

I didn't know they had such a party. NHK is a vector of liberal cancer so that's good to hear.

But my main takeaway from this story is I have no idea what we're meant to take away from it. Either I skipped over the important parts or the other comments are reading what they want into it. Besides wait times (I guess so the whores can change their minds before people find out they were whores?), what does the law do? Who's asking for it? What was the motivation? Sankaku is lacking important context. I don't feel like a googlin today.

208 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

My first reaction was to laugh at the protesters up bringing human rights and up dignity with regards to porn stars. The article focuses on "actresses". I doubt anyone ever cared how men were treated in the industry.

Second reaction was to

Satoshi Hamada, a member of the House of Councilors of the Party to Protect the People from NHK

I didn't know they had such a party. NHK is a vector of liberal cancer so that's good to hear.

But my main takeaway from this story is I have no idea what we're to take away it. Either I skipped over the important parts or the other comments are reading what they want into it. Besides wait times (I guess so the whores can change their minds before people find out they were whores?), what does the law do? Who's asking for it? What was the motivation? Sankaku is lacking important context. I don't feel like a googlin today.

208 days ago
1 score