No arguments here. That is the how the population of those states (and the nations they represent) have been for multiple generations.

Then why the splitting hairs and the argument that you can properly import non-whites as long as they're integrated?

What's the correct number for which we can declare racial ownership of some issue? I can find lots of right-wing rights who say that sentence. Damn near all of them.

That threshold is certainly below 85%, especially when Jews take leading roles in every major modern institution.

Rightwingers will not regurgitate that sentiment en masse - you've lost touch with reality on that one. Whatever the number is, it's smaller than you think and it's growing smaller every day.

And for the most part, the jews have been grateful for the treatment of American gentiles towards them; not antagonistic. This is one of the reasons why the US has the largest population of jews on earth. Where we see resentment is from Leftist indoctrination and ideological capture.

I could spend the whole comment on this paragraph. Jews give evangelical whites one of the lowest approval ratings among all groups, for instance. None of that addresses my point anyway that Jews are a uniquely exalted class that can hold the highest concentration of institutional power in America, hold dual loyalties, lead the entire Congress around by the nose, while simultaneously donning the mantle of the ultimate victim. Talk about reparations, Israel extracts billions of dollars from the US every year simply for existing.

If you don't want either, recognize the danger of any communist among the native population. If we're going to focus on whites, then you need to recognize the absolute plethora of white Leftists.

First of all, many white libs, if not most, are the result of deconstructive Jewish ideas that broke up white Christian hegemony, such as psychoanalysis, anthropology and cultural relativism (mentioned earlier), rejection of racial IQ or advantages, feminism, gay rights, the ADL, hardcore pornography, Onlyfans, the Frankfurt school, and of course, communism itself. In the 20th century, it's actually a challenge to find disruptive Gentile intellectuals like Kinsey and John Money.

Second, we do recognize the danger. I'm certainly not going to turn away any anti-communist because they're not white. I mean, I'm not white. But any serious discussion is going to lead to propaganda and indoctrination, which leads to wresting control of the narrative from the media and elites, in which wealthy Jews have a controlling stake.

That's just not true. America is one of the pinnacle examples of being able to integrate populations, even after mass migration. Whether that be the hordes of hessians, the flood of migrants from Europe, the mass importation of Blacks from slavery, the integration of natives, etc.

The problem is that party-boss systems that exploit ethnic division for their own purposes has been nationalized since the 60's, and the Republicans have played "loveable looser" for decades, allowing the left to dis- integrate, or re-segregate just about any ethnic group they could think of in order to consolidate power as they lost the white vote

First of all, America hasn't integrated any non-white population successfully. The natives are miserable and killing themselves, black people are self-explanatory, Asians vote Democrat, and so do Hispanics. But the cherry on top is that all of those groups will preferentially segregate to themselves both SOCIALLY and politically.

Second, the ethnic party-boss systems such as Tammany Hall are the result of human nature, and nothing that Republicans did would have stopped them.

No arguments here. That is the how the population of those states (and the nations they represent) have been for multiple generations.

Then why the splitting hairs and the argument that you can properly import non-whites as long as they're integrated?

What's the correct number for which we can declare racial ownership of some issue? I can find lots of right-wing rights who say that sentence. Damn near all of them.

That threshold is certainly below 85%, especially when Jews take leading roles in every major modern institution.

Rightwingers will not regurgitate that sentiment en masse - you've lost touch with reality on that one. Whatever the number is, it's smaller than you think and it's growing smaller every day.

And for the most part, the jews have been grateful for the treatment of American gentiles towards them; not antagonistic. This is one of the reasons why the US has the largest population of jews on earth. Where we see resentment is from Leftist indoctrination and ideological capture.

I could spend the whole comment on this paragraph. Jews give evangelical whites one of the lowest approval ratings among all groups, for instance. None of that addresses my point anyway that Jews are a uniquely exalted class that can hold the highest concentration of institutional power in America, hold dual loyalties, lead the entire Congress around by the nose, while simultaneously donning the mantle of the ultimate victim. Talk about reparations, Israel extracts billions of dollars from the US every year simply for existing.

If you don't want either, recognize the danger of any communist among the native population. If we're going to focus on whites, then you need to recognize the absolute plethora of white Leftists.

First of all, many white libs, if not most, are the result of deconstructive Jewish ideas that broke up white Christian hegemony, such as psychoanalysis, anthropology and cultural relativism (mentioned earlier), rejection of racial IQ or advantages, feminism, gay rights, the ADL, hardcore pornography, Onlyfans, the Frankfurt school, and of course, communism itself. In the 20th century, it's actually a challenge to find disruptive Gentile intellectuals like Kinsey and John Money.

Second, we do recognize the danger. I'm certainly not going to turn away any anti-communist because they're not white. I mean, I'm not white. But any serious discussion is going to lead to propaganda and indoctrination, which leads to wresting control of the narrative from the media and elites, in which wealthy Jews have a controlling stake.

That's just not true. America is one of the pinnacle examples of being able to integrate populations, even after mass migration. Whether that be the hordes of hessians, the flood of migrants from Europe, the mass importation of Blacks from slavery, the integration of natives, etc.

The problem is that party-boss systems that exploit ethnic division for their own purposes has been nationalized since the 60's, and the Republicans have played "loveable looser" for decades, allowing the left to dis- integrate, or re-segregate just about any ethnic group they could think of in order to consolidate power as they lost the white vote

First of all, America hasn't integrated any non-white population successfully. The natives are miserable and killing themselves, black people are self-explanatory, Asians vote Democrat, and so do Hispanics. But the cherry on top is that all of those groups will preferentially segregate to themselves both SOCIALLY and politically, and the rate of segregation actually increases with educational level.

Second, the ethnic party-boss systems such as Tammany Hall are the result of human nature, and nothing that Republicans did would have stopped them.

No arguments here. That is the how the population of those states (and the nations they represent) have been for multiple generations.

Then why the splitting hairs and the argument that you can properly import non-whites as long as they're integrated?

What's the correct number for which we can declare racial ownership of some issue? I can find lots of right-wing rights who say that sentence. Damn near all of them.

That threshold is certainly below 85%, especially when Jews take leading roles in every major modern institution.

Rightwingers will not regurgitate that sentiment en masse - you've lost touch with reality on that one. Whatever the number is, it's smaller than you think and it's growing smaller every day.

And for the most part, the jews have been grateful for the treatment of American gentiles towards them; not antagonistic. This is one of the reasons why the US has the largest population of jews on earth. Where we see resentment is from Leftist indoctrination and ideological capture.

I could spend the whole comment on this paragraph. Jews give evangelical whites one of the lowest approval ratings among all groups, for instance. None of that addresses my point anyway that Jews are a uniquely exalted class that can hold the highest concentration of institutional power in America, hold dual loyalties, lead the entire Congress around by the nose, while simultaneously donning the mantle of the ultimate victim. Talk about reparations, Israel extracts billions of dollars from the US every year simply for existing.

If you don't want either, recognize the danger of any communist among the native population. If we're going to focus on whites, then you need to recognize the absolute plethora of white Leftists.

First of all, many white libs, if not most, are the result of deconstructive Jewish ideas that broke up white Christian hegemony, such as psychoanalysis, anthropology and cultural relativism (mentioned earlier), rejection of racial IQ or advantages, feminism, gay rights, the ADL, hardcore pornography, Onlyfans, the Frankfurt school, and of course, communism itself.

Second, we do recognize the danger. I'm certainly not going to turn away any anti-communist because they're not white. I mean, I'm not white. But any serious discussion is going to lead to propaganda and indoctrination, which leads to wresting control of the narrative from the media and elites, in which wealthy Jews have a controlling stake.

That's just not true. America is one of the pinnacle examples of being able to integrate populations, even after mass migration. Whether that be the hordes of hessians, the flood of migrants from Europe, the mass importation of Blacks from slavery, the integration of natives, etc.

The problem is that party-boss systems that exploit ethnic division for their own purposes has been nationalized since the 60's, and the Republicans have played "loveable looser" for decades, allowing the left to dis- integrate, or re-segregate just about any ethnic group they could think of in order to consolidate power as they lost the white vote

First of all, America hasn't integrated any non-white population successfully. The natives are miserable and killing themselves, black people are self-explanatory, Asians vote Democrat, and so do Hispanics. But the cherry on top is that all of those groups will preferentially segregate to themselves both SOCIALLY and politically, and the rate of segregation actually increases with educational level.

Second, the ethnic party-boss systems such as Tammany Hall are the result of human nature, and nothing that Republicans did would have stopped them.