This significantly dumbs down what "God"* means, as he needn't even be a mind; merely an eternal depth of transcendent organization.+ I assert that [C]onsciousness is not describable by math or science; and [G]oodness is not usually described even by philosophy or by religion. These [C][G] are necessary to embody the implied "ultimate mindful transcendent good personal power" loaded into the modern term "God"*. So math DOES show the mere transcendent aspect of God's internal organization, as expressed in his creation; it fails to name him, or even to imply he's a he. That's all.

+ a presence without necessary personhood, effectiveness without necessary design (though this one is a koan), transcendent data without necessary self-awareness

* the All-Thing, possessing:

• the ability to be everywhere he wants

• the power to accomplish whatever his goals

• the every knowledge he desires

• WANTS/GOALS/DESIRES that drive these

• Ultimate goodness that roots these W/G/D

• All without needing any help

• All without precedent or peer

This significantly dumbs down what "God"* means, as he needn't even be a mind; merely an eternal depth of transcendent organization.+ I assert that [C]onsciousness is not describable by math or science; and [G]oodness is not usually described even by philosophy or by religion. These [C][G] are necessary to embody the implied "ultimate mindful transcendent good personal power" loaded into the modern term "God"*. So math DOES show the mere transcendent aspect of God's internal organization, as expressed in his creation; it fails to name him, or even to imply he's a he. That's all.

+ a presence without necessary personhood, effectiveness without necessary design (though this one is a koan), transcendent data without necessary self-awareness

* the All-Thing, possessing:

• the ability to be everywhere he wants

• the power to accomplish whatever his goals

• the every knowledge he desires

• WANTS/GOALS/DESIRES that drive these

• Ultimate goodness that roots these W/G/D

• All without needing any help

• All without precedent or peer

This significantly dumbs down what "God"* means, as he needn't even be a mind; merely an eternal depth of transcendent organization.+ I assert that [C]onsciousness is not describable by math or science; and [G]oodness is not usually described even by philosophy or by religion. These [C][G] are necessary to embody the implied "ultimate mindful transcendent good personhood" loaded into the modern term "God"*. So math DOES show the mere transcendent aspect of God's internal organization, as expressed in his creation; it fails to name him, or even to imply he's a he. That's all.

+ a presence without necessary personhood, effectiveness without necessary design (though this one is a koan), transcendent data without necessary self-awareness

* the All-Thing, possessing:

• the ability to be everywhere he wants

• the power to accomplish whatever his goals

• the every knowledge he desires

• WANTS/GOALS/DESIRES that drive these

• Ultimate goodness that roots these W/G/D

• All without needing any help

• All without precedent or peer

This significantly dumbs down what "God"* means, as he needn't even be a mind; merely an eternal depth of transcendent organization.+ I assert that [C]onsciousness is not describable by math or science; and [G]oodness is not usually described even by philosophy or by religion. These [C][G] are necessary to embody the implied "ultimate mindful transcendent good personhood" loaded into the modern term "God"*. So math DOES show the mere transcendent aspect of God's internal organization, as expressed in his creation; it fails to name him, or even to imply he's a he. That's all.

+ a presence without necessary personhood, effectiveness without necessary design (though this one is a koan), transcendent data without necessary self-awareness

* the All-Thing, possessing:

• the ability to be everywhere it wants

• the power to accomplish whatever its goals

• the every knowledge it desires

• WANTS/GOALS/DESIRES that drive these

• Ultimate goodness that roots these W/G/D

• All without needing any help

• All without precedent or peer