thailand isnt an absolute monarchy its still technically a constitutional monarchy, the king technically isnt the decision maker. but its illegal to criticize the king and he's the one that approves or disapproves the laws.

USUALLY a monarchy has more incentive to do the right thing (than random politicians who just want to line up their pockets and then just leave once their term is over), , because the king has to think about their descendants and would want to leave the kingdom intact for their descendants to inherit and they can make better long term plans as the king compared to a random politician that's only in office for the short term, (and who may make decisions just for public approval, for the short term even if in the long term its a bad decision). A king is also more able to quickly dispose of bad or bad foreign elements in the country without having to go through the barriers of democracy.

but of course its not guaranteed

thailand isnt an absolute monarchy its still technically a constitutional monarchy, the king technically isnt the decision maker. but its illegal to criticize the king and he's the one that approves or disapproves the laws.

USUALLY a monarchy has more incentive to do the right thing (than random politicians who just want to line up their pockets and then just leave once their term is over), , because the king has to think about their descendants and would want to leave the kingdom intact for their descendants to inherit and they can make better long term plans as the king compared to a random politician that's only in office for the short term, (and who may make decisions just for public approval, for the short term even if in the long term its a bad decision). . ,

but of course its not guaranteed