if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by token of their ancestry is a Jewish idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by token of their ancestry is a Jewish idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewish idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitrating happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitrating about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord, and by implication cannot follow His path to salvation. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you have been "chosen" by God to be saved unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, perhaps you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you are "chosen" by God to be saved, unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decided for yourself that you are "chosen" by God to be saved, unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son. Christ suffered and died for us so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decide for yourself that you are "chosen" by God to be saved, unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No "arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that certain people are chosen by God above others by their ancestry is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son, who suffered and died so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just people like you who have decide for yourself that you are "chosen" by God to be saved, unlike "Bungbwa" from Nigeria.

if you are, i ask that you read what i have already said again, especially the parts where i clarify that i do not call myself any sort of ultimate arbite

I'm not putting words in your mouth. You are simply rationalizing your behavior by pretending saying you are not being arbiter yet at the same time saying things that show you are being an arbiter.

For example, your words:

It is not up to me to decide, ultimately, what African rises above his ancestry and finds salvation, and what African doesn't

So it's not up to you to decide if an African finds salvation, but you have already decided that he has "ancestry" (i.e. inferior implied) that he needs to "rise above". Unlike your "ancestry", which makes you less of a sinner than him, by default, apparently. Yet, according to our Lord, you and him equally have original sin. You are equally capable of being sinners. But, no, you are capable of being a "better" Christian than an African man by default. What kind of blasphemy is this? No, you are not really being the "ultimate" arbiter, but you are being an arbiter nonetheless.

but you will only make it harder on yourself by ignoring the racial aspect and attempting to reason with those for whom reason is a biological impossibility

So for some "races", "reason is a biological impossibility". No "arbitering happening there, is there? You have already determined that these people have no 'reason' and thus cannot receive the word of our Lord. You are clearly doing plenty of arbitering about these races of people, yet you pretend you are not.

The idea that so people are more "chosen" by God than others is a Jewist idea that was invalidated by the new covenant that was created when the Father gave us His Son, who suffered and died so that we all have a path to salvation, not just a chosen few, and certainly not just plenty who have decide for themselves that they are "chosen".