if the 0.2% of the world population is the extremely tribal people that currently control banking, media and politics, and aggressively push certain ideologies and policies, then it would be far more impactful than snapping away the 49.75% that dont.

if the 0.2% of the world population is the extremely tribal people that currently control, banking, media and politics, and aggressively push certain ideologies and policies, then it would be far more impactful than snapping away the 49.75% that dont.

if the 0.2% of the world population is the extremely tribal people that currently control, banking, media and politics, and aggressively push certain ideologies, then it would be far more impactful than snapping away the 49.75% that dont.

if its the 0.2% of the world population that currently control, banking, media and politics, and who are also extremely tribal and aggressively push certain ideologies, then it would be far more impactful than snapping away the 49.75% that dont.