You're actually making me the Voluntaryist argue against extreme sexual infidelity over porn. Considering that porn doesn't cause wars of succession due to monarchies and how they work then yes I would argue that sexual infidelity is far more damaging. I can also point towards far more modern examples like the epidemic of single mothers especially in black communities.

Infidelity is not the root cause of monarchic wars of succession, monarchies are. Man, what a retarded argument. Even then people were at least having children in that time period, not committing generational suicide.

Infidelity in the black community exploded since the 60s, when hardcore porn gained traction. I'm not arguing that this is anything more than a coincidence but why, exactly, did you bring this up? This is yet another example of cultural standards degrading in the last hundred years - AKA, the past was indeed better. In today's superior culture, we have furries and trannies running the country and the very fabric of reality is coming apart.

Now I know why you have the opinions that you have, you've got the Jew hate on so hardcore you'll ignore historical fact to point out how much worse everything is because Jews. Since degeneracy of ancestors can't be traced back to Judaism you ignore it as it's inconvenient, very much like the SJWs do.

Cool psychoanalysis bro. You'd fit right in with Freud, the Jewish guy that invented the idea that all men secretly want to diddle their mother.

No, I won't let you defend this, it's bullshit and ignores historical fact for the sake of winning an argument on the internet. The majority of people in that era did not live like that. Yes you can make an argument about inflation, purchasing power was a lot better than it is today, however poor families were extremely fucked during this time period compared to modern standards but that varies from family to family I can still safely make that argument.

OK, safely make the argument then. Purchasing power was better, home ownership was better, nuclear families were healthier, people were less depressed, but poor families were somehow extremely worse off than today? How?

Are you making an argument in favor of gimmedats? Was the Great Society a great idea?

You're actually making me the Voluntaryist argue against extreme sexual infidelity over porn. Considering that porn doesn't cause wars of succession due to monarchies and how they work then yes I would argue that sexual infidelity is far more damaging. I can also point towards far more modern examples like the epidemic of single mothers especially in black communities.

Infidelity is not the root cause of monarchic wars of succession, monarchies are. Man, what a retarded argument. Even then people were having children in that time period, not committing generational suicide.

Infidelity in the black community exploded since the 60s, when hardcore porn gained traction. I'm not arguing that this is anything more than a coincidence but why, exactly, did you bring this up? This is yet another example of cultural standards degrading in the last hundred years - AKA, the past was indeed better. In today's superior culture, we have furries and trannies running the country and the very fabric of reality is coming apart.

Now I know why you have the opinions that you have, you've got the Jew hate on so hardcore you'll ignore historical fact to point out how much worse everything is because Jews. Since degeneracy of ancestors can't be traced back to Judaism you ignore it as it's inconvenient, very much like the SJWs do.

Cool psychoanalysis bro. You'd fit right in with Freud, the Jewish guy that invented the idea that all men secretly want to diddle their mother.

No, I won't let you defend this, it's bullshit and ignores historical fact for the sake of winning an argument on the internet. The majority of people in that era did not live like that. Yes you can make an argument about inflation, purchasing power was a lot better than it is today, however poor families were extremely fucked during this time period compared to modern standards but that varies from family to family I can still safely make that argument.

OK, safely make the argument then. Purchasing power was better, home ownership was better, nuclear families were healthier, people were less depressed, but poor families were somehow extremely worse off than today? How?

Are you making an argument in favor of gimmedats? Was the Great Society a great idea?

You're actually making me the Voluntaryist argue against extreme sexual infidelity over porn. Considering that porn doesn't cause wars of succession due to monarchies and how they work then yes I would argue that sexual infidelity is far more damaging. I can also point towards far more modern examples like the epidemic of single mothers especially in black communities.

Infidelity is not the root cause of monarchic wars of succession, monarchies are. Man, what a retarded argument. Even then people were having children in that time period, not committing generational suicide.

Infidelity in the black community exploded since the 60s, when hardcore porn gained traction. I'm not arguing that this is anything more than a coincidence but why, exactly, did you bring this up? This is yet another example of cultural standards degrading in the last hundred years - AKA, the past was indeed better.

Now I know why you have the opinions that you have, you've got the Jew hate on so hardcore you'll ignore historical fact to point out how much worse everything is because Jews. Since degeneracy of ancestors can't be traced back to Judaism you ignore it as it's inconvenient, very much like the SJWs do.

Cool psychoanalysis bro. You'd fit right in with Freud, the Jewish guy that invented the idea that all men secretly want to diddle their mother.

No, I won't let you defend this, it's bullshit and ignores historical fact for the sake of winning an argument on the internet. The majority of people in that era did not live like that. Yes you can make an argument about inflation, purchasing power was a lot better than it is today, however poor families were extremely fucked during this time period compared to modern standards but that varies from family to family I can still safely make that argument.

OK, safely make the argument then. Purchasing power was better, home ownership was better, nuclear families were healthier, people were less depressed, but poor families were somehow extremely worse off than today? How?

Are you making an argument in favor of gimmedats? Was the Great Society a great idea?