Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

They did and they didn't, this is why again, are you seriously going to tell me that men who weren't getting sex in a regular relationship wouldn't just go and get it through payment or some other means?

A lot of men did. Still better for society than porn.

I bring this all up because porn is simply an evolution of how men are dealing with their sex drives.

Bullshit. Porn is a Jewish tool to destabilize society, and it works, just like psychoanalysis, anthropology, and communism. There is nothing evolved or natural about a modern product that has existed for less than a hundred years.

No one's praising it or anything this is just reality. I feel like this reeks of the kind of bullshit I saw being posted around on social media with people going "Look at how much better life was in the 60's" and then they were frequently posting up obvious marketing propaganda from an air travel company and it was clearly a middle/upper class families' living standards being shown.

Guess what? Cultural products like those marketing ads have some truth to them. Americans were flat out better off in the 60s. You could have the house and picket fence and nuclear family on a single income salary at the factory. Goods cost less in real dollars and your paycheck went longer.

What you're reciting now through other means is the basic leftist mantra that human beings were always just as crooked, greedy, deceptive, and debased as they are today, it was just hidden more effectively in the past. This is not true. The existence of vice in the past does not erase the vastly better rates of dual-parent heterosexual parenting, for example. At the same time, certain phenomena like the lead poisoning crime wave and the iron grip of unions did create worse conditions than today. But it is simply intellectually lazy to comfort yourself that your particular failings are no more or less harmful than those of your ancestors.

338 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

They did and they didn't, this is why again, are you seriously going to tell me that men who weren't getting sex in a regular relationship wouldn't just go and get it through payment or some other means?

A lot of men did. Still better for society than porn.

I bring this all up because porn is simply an evolution of how men are dealing with their sex drives.

Bullshit. Porn is a Jewish tool to destabilize society, and it works, just like psychoanalysis, anthropology, and communism. There is nothing evolved or natural about a modern product that has existed for less than a hundred years.

No one's praising it or anything this is just reality. I feel like this reeks of the kind of bullshit I saw being posted around on social media with people going "Look at how much better life was in the 60's" and then they were frequently posting up obvious marketing propaganda from an air travel company and it was clearly a middle/upper class families' living standards being shown.

Guess what? Cultural products like those marketing ads have some truth to them. Americans were flat out better off and more numerous in the 60s. You could have the house and picket fence and nuclear family on a single income salary at the factory. Goods cost less in real dollars and your paycheck went longer.

What you're reciting now through other means is the basic leftist mantra that human beings were always just as crooked, greedy, deceptive, and debased as they are today, it was just hidden more effectively in the past. This is not true. The existence of vice in the past does not erase the vastly better rates of dual-parent heterosexual parenting, for example. At the same time, certain phenomena like the lead poisoning crime wave and the iron grip of unions did create worse conditions than today. But it is simply intellectually lazy to comfort yourself that your particular failings are no more or less harmful than those of your ancestors.

338 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

They did and they didn't, this is why again, are you seriously going to tell me that men who weren't getting sex in a regular relationship wouldn't just go and get it through payment or some other means?

A lot of men did. Still better for society than porn.

I bring this all up because porn is simply an evolution of how men are dealing with their sex drives.

Bullshit. Porn is a Jewish tool to destabilize society, and it works, just like psychoanalysis, anthropology, and communism. There is nothing evolved or natural about a modern product that has existed for less than a hundred years.

No one's praising it or anything this is just reality. I feel like this reeks of the kind of bullshit I saw being posted around on social media with people going "Look at how much better life was in the 60's" and then they were frequently posting up obvious marketing propaganda from an air travel company and it was clearly a middle/upper class families' living standards being shown.

Guess what? Cultural products like those marketing ads have some truth to them. Americans were flat out better off and more numerous in the 60s. You could have the house and picket fence and nuclear family on a single income salary at the factory. Goods cost less in real dollars and your paycheck went longer.

What you're reciting now through other means is the basic leftist mantra that human beings were always just as crooked, greedy, deceptive, and debased as they are today, it was just hidden more effectively in the past. This is not true. The existence of vice in the past does not erase the vastly better rates of dual-parent heterosexual parenting, for example. At the same time, certain phenomena like the lead poisoning crime wave and the iron grip of unions did create worse conditions than today. But it is simply intellectually lazy to comfort yourself that your particular failings are no more or less harmful than those of your ancestors.

338 days ago
1 score