One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who chooses (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists (and women in general) do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that reality isn't that important, rather what matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

What happens to a society when it becomes feminized so (2) becomes the dominant modus operandi is left as an exercise for the reader.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who chooses (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists (and women in general) do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality is that important, rather what matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

What happens to a society when it becomes feminized so (2) becomes the dominant modus operandi is left as an exercise for the reader.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who chooses (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists (and women in general) do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality is that important, rather what matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

What happens to a society when it becomes feminized so (2) becomes the modus operandi for everyone is left as an exercise for the reader.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who chooses (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists (and women in general) do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality is that important, rather what matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

What happens to a society when it becomes feminized so (2) becomes the modus operandi when everyone is doing it is left as an exercise for the reader.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who chooses (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists (and women in general) do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality doesn't actually matter, rather the only thing that matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it; or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who choose (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality doesn't actually matter, rather the only thing that matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to be good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it? or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who choose (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality doesn't actually matter, rather the only thing that matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.

One of the funniest things about (female) feminists is their inferiority complex. They know they are not as good at men at men's roles. So to make themselves "feel better" they invent fictional stories to reassure themselves that yes, they are actually as good at men in men's roles.

This argument is more revealing when one maps it on to male behavior. Let's say there's a man who sucks at something and feels bad about this because he wants to good at it. What does he do:

1. Actually go out and improve himself and get better at it? or
2. Just make up a story about how he is actually good at doing that thing and so he feels better.

Most men would choose (1). A man who choose (2) would be laughed at by everyone. Yet, what feminists do is choose (2). This is because in the female world, what matters isn't so much as actual physical reality, but rather social status. In the physical world, (1) is the only answer that makes sense. Reality doesn't care about the imaginary stories you tell yourself. But in a world where social status matters more, (2) is justified on the basis that it reality doesn't actually matter, rather the only thing that matters is what others think as they can then be manipulated into providing actual physical rewards to you.