So am I to understand your view is that "Irish ethno-nationalists deserve no support because they're still progressives"?

Edit: Since you didn't bite... Assuming that's an accurate summary of your perspective, I'm having difficulty perceiving what your endgame is. How do you win when you'd rather take a loss than settle for the achievable partial victory?

Conceptually I understand why some people are all-or-nothing purists, but only when that rhetoric is backed by accelerationist action. If you will only accept total success, your only path to that lies on the other side of total collapse, because you'll never accept a world where you compromise with your opponents.

If you read enough history you see that real life rarely produces situations where a system totally and utterly collapses and is successfully replaced by something better. The few times it has happened almost always involve a dictator.

So am I to understand your view is that "Irish ethno-nationalists deserve no support because they're still progressives"?

Edit: Since you didn't bite... Assuming that's an accurate summary of your perspective, I'm having difficulty perceiving what your endgame is. How do you win when you'd rather take a loss than settle for the achievable partial victory?

Conceptually I understand why some people are all-or-nothing purists, but only when that rhetoric is backed by accelerationist action. If you will only accept total success, your only path to that lies on the other side of total collapse, because you'll never accept a world where you compromise with your opponents.

So am I to understand your view is that "Irish ethno-nationalists deserve no support because they're still progressives"?