It's a denigrating non-argument.

All journalists do their work for "clicks and clout".

There is no journalist who dosen't want readers ( clicks ) and make a living off his work ( clout ).

The manifesto was highly news-worthy in a context of quickly worsening anti-White actions by institutions and individuals.

It just hurts the agenda of anti-White institutions. So they deem it morally wrong and wish to criminalize + censor such news reporting.

It's a denigrating non-argument.

All journalists do their work for "clicks and clout".

There is no journalists who dosen't want readers ( clicks ) and make a living off his work ( clout ).

The manifesto was highly news-worthy in a context of quickly worsening anti-White actions by institutions and individuals.

It just hurts the agenda of anti-White institutions. So they deem it morally wrong and wish to criminalize + censor such news reporting.

It's a denigrating non-argument.

All journalists do their work for "clicks and clout".

There is no journalists who dosen't want readers ( clicks ) and make a living off his work ( clout ).

The manifesto was highly news-worthy in a context of quickly worsening anti-White context.

It just hurts the agenda of anti-White institutions. So they deem it morally wrong and wish to criminalize + censor such news reporting.