Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Copium and damage control.

The experiment produced results that did not agree with leftoid theory, therefore the experiment must have been done incorrectly. Many such cases!

A sack of potatoes and a rectangular dyke couldn't sell underwear designed with the sole purpose getting people horny enough to fuck. Or in other words, a pair of 4/10 women couldn't sell fuck-me panties to a clientele of mostly heterosexuals and high-femme lesbians.

These days, females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

HOLY FUCK.

That statement isn't just wrong, it's wronger than it has ever fucking been. How many gen-X women, how many boomer women, how many 50's housewives, would have leapt at the chance to parade their bodies before crowds of anonymous men?

The number has grown with every passing generation. The statement in this article is fucking backwards. Women are bigger whores for drooling, erect male attention than ever before. We are at a time of utterly unprecedented whoredom.

The writer of this article is beyond deluded.

That said, I can't help but read the truth hiding in the negative space of her writing:

gasping boys and dirty old men

Too young and poor: 'gasping boy'

Too old: 'dirty old man'

No complaints about the attention of a wealthy man of appropriate age.

247 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Copium and damage control.

The experiment produced results that did not agree with leftoid theory, therefore the experiment must have been done incorrectly. Many such cases!

A sack of potatoes and a rectangular dyke couldn't sell underwear designed with the sole purpose getting people horny enough to fuck. Or in other words, a pair of 4/10 women couldn't sell fuck-me panties to a clientele of mostly heterosexuals and high-femme lesbians.

These days, females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

HOLY FUCK.

That statement isn't just wrong, it's wronger than it has ever fucking been. How many gen-X women, how many boomer women, how many 50's housewives, would have leapt at the chance to parade their bodies before crowds of anonymous men?

The number has grown with every passing generation. The statement in this article is fucking backwards. Women are bigger whores for drooling, erect male attention than ever before. We are at a time of utterly unprecedented whoredom.

The writer of this article is beyond deluded.

That said, I can't help but read the truth hiding in the negative space of her writing:

females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

Too young and poor: 'gasping boy'

Too old: 'dirty old man'

No complaints about the attention of a wealthy man of appropriate age.

247 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Copium and damage control.

The experiment produced results that did not agree with leftoid theory, therefore the experiment must have been done incorrectly. Many such cases!

A sack of potatoes and a rectangular dyke couldn't sell underwear designed with the sole purpose getting people horny enough to fuck. Or in other words, a pair of 4/10 women couldn't sell fuck-me panties to a clientele of mostly heterosexuals and high-femme lesbians.

These days, females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

HOLY FUCK.

That statement isn't just wrong, it's wronger than it has ever fucking been. How many gen-X women, how many boomer women, how many 50's housewives, would have leapt at the chance to parade their bodies before crowds of anonymous men?

The number has grown with every passing generation. The statement in this article is fucking backwards. Women are bigger whores for drooling, erect male attention than ever before. We are at a time of utterly unprecedented whoredom.

The writer of this article is beyond deluded.

That said, I can't help but read the truth hiding in the negative space of her writing:

females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

Too young and poor: 'boy' Too old: 'dirty old man'

No complaints about the attention of a wealthy man of appropriate age.

247 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Copium and damage control.

The experiment produced results that did not agree with leftoid theory, therefore the experiment must have been done incorrectly. Many such cases!

A sack of potatoes and a rectangular dyke couldn't sell underwear designed with the sole purpose getting people horny enough to fuck. Or in other words, a pair of 4/10 women couldn't sell fuck-me panties to a clientele of mostly heterosexuals and high-femme lesbians.

These days, females don’t feel the burning need to be objectified and drooled over by gasping boys and dirty old men

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

HOLY FUCK.

That statement isn't just wrong, it's wronger than it has ever fucking been. How many gen-X women, how many boomer women, how many 50's housewives, would have leapt at the chance to parade their bodies before crowds of anonymous men?

The number has grown with every passing generation. The statement in this article is fucking backwards. Women are bigger whores for drooling, erect male attention than ever before. We are at a time of utterly unprecedented whoredom.

The writer of this article is beyond deluded.

247 days ago
1 score