That isn't a single defined "test", it isn't particularly hard to accomplish with math as proved by GPT, and has nothing to do with sentience or sapience - except for language capability being one way to measure intelligence.

It's a fun philosophical question but is meaningless for that purpose now that we know how easy language mimicry can be without any intelligence.

(I assumed by "a big leap forward" you meant on the road to sentience, sorry if you meant something else)

That isn't a single defined "test", it isn't particularly hard to accomplish with math as proved by GPT, and has nothing to do with sentience or sapience - except for language capability being one way to measure intelligence.

It's a fun philosophical question but is meaningless for that purpose now that we know how easy language mimicry can be without any intelligence.

(I assumed by "a big leap forward" you meant it is heading towards sentience, sorry if you meant something else)

That isn't a single defined "test", it isn't particularly hard to accomplish with math as proved by GPT, and has nothing to do with sentience or sapience - except for language capability being one way to measure intelligence.

It's a fun philosophical question but is meaningless for that purpose now that we know how easy language mimicry can be without any intelligence. The "test" either needs to be updated or only applied to Black Boxes. (not well-understood algorithms)