I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?

"Toxic" is a vague insult that has different meanings depending on the speaker who uses them and their audience. It's practically slang. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?

Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.

I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?

"Toxic" is a vague insult that has different meanings depending on the speaker who uses them and their audience. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?

Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.

I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?

"Toxic" is a meaningless insult that has different meanings depending on the speaker who uses them and their audience. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?

Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.

I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?

We all know "toxic" is a meaningless derogatory adjective that has different emotional connotations depending on the speaker who invokes them and their audience. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?

Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.

I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? Their narrative rests on axioms that they merely assume the audience holds, so they don't need to back them up with evidence. I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?

We all know "toxic" is a meaningless derogatory adjective that has different emotional connotations depending on the speaker who invokes them and their audience. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?

Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.