Both conservatives and liberals bemoan men’s underrepresentation in higher education, their greater likelihood to die a “death of despair,” and the growing share of them who are not working or looking for work. But the chorus of concern rarely touches on how male decline shapes the lives of the people most likely to date or marry them—that is to say, women.

What a load of shit. This problem has been left to fester for decades, and the only reason anyone gives a shit now is because women are being inconvenienced. Well, that and their boogeyman Andrew Tate has men and boys questioning the feminist narrative that they've been fed since birth.

Egg freezing was not about their careers. It was about being single or in very unstable relationships with men who were unwilling to commit to them.

She was struck by how many young Arab men valued and looked forward to fatherhood—a sharp contrast with what she heard from young American women, who shared story after story of men “who were simply unready or unwilling to commit.”

"Unwilling to commit" is the key point here. Once again their worldview starts making sense when you substitute in "Chad and Tyrone" whenever they say "men".

egg freezing ... is not a process anyone undergoes lightly. It entails injecting high doses of hormones over a period of days or weeks to induce multiple oocytes to grow (in a typical ovulatory cycle, a single oocyte matures in preparation for fertilization), frequent in-clinic monitoring with blood draws and often transvaginal ultrasounds, and a retrieval under sedation. The eggs are then rapidly cooled, at which point they can be stored for years. In the U.S., the procedure—which is starting to more commonly, though not predominantly, be covered by employer insurance plans—can cost anywhere from $7,500 to $18,000 per cycle, depending on the city and the clinic, plus annual storage fees of $500 to $1,000 a year.

Imagine going through all of this because you hate betas so much. These whores deserve every bit of misery that they've brought upon themselves.

Inhorn categorizes this army of the “unready or unwilling” into 10 archetypes the women claim are responsible for their dating misery

Funny how they don't ask the men their side of the story. Maybe it's time to look at the roastie in mirror?

As long as these patterns hold, the growing chasm between college-educated men and women is going to leave some women partnerless.

Tell them to fuck off and die, just as they gleefully tell the male incels. I know a number of women who found a husband before the age of 25, and they were all able to do so because they made it priority. It's the ones who rode the cock carousel until the age of 35 and expect a billionaire gigachad to descend from the heavens and marry them that are having issues, and they can go get fucked in the bed they made.

Both conservatives and liberals bemoan men’s underrepresentation in higher education, their greater likelihood to die a “death of despair,” and the growing share of them who are not working or looking for work. But the chorus of concern rarely touches on how male decline shapes the lives of the people most likely to date or marry them—that is to say, women.

What a load of shit. This problem has been left to fester for decades, and the only reason anyone gives a shit now is because women are being inconvenienced. Well, that and their boogeyman Andrew Tate has men and boys questioning the feminist narrative that they've been fed since birth.

Egg freezing was not about their careers. It was about being single or in very unstable relationships with men who were unwilling to commit to them.

She was struck by how many young Arab men valued and looked forward to fatherhood—a sharp contrast with what she heard from young American women, who shared story after story of men “who were simply unready or unwilling to commit.”

"Unwilling to commit" is the key point here. Once again their worldview starts making sense when you substitute in "Chad and Tyrone" whenever they say "men".

egg freezing ... is not a process anyone undergoes lightly. It entails injecting high doses of hormones over a period of days or weeks to induce multiple oocytes to grow (in a typical ovulatory cycle, a single oocyte matures in preparation for fertilization), frequent in-clinic monitoring with blood draws and often transvaginal ultrasounds, and a retrieval under sedation. The eggs are then rapidly cooled, at which point they can be stored for years. In the U.S., the procedure—which is starting to more commonly, though not predominantly, be covered by employer insurance plans—can cost anywhere from $7,500 to $18,000 per cycle, depending on the city and the clinic, plus annual storage fees of $500 to $1,000 a year.

Imagine going through all of this because you hate betas so much. These whores deserve every bit of misery that they've brought upon themselves.

Inhorn categorizes this army of the “unready or unwilling” into 10 archetypes the women claim are responsible for their dating misery

Funny how they don't ask the men their side of the story. Maybe it's time to look at the roastie in mirror?

As long as these patterns hold, the growing chasm between college-educated men and women is going to leave some women partnerless.

Tell them to fuck off and die, and just they would gladly tell the male incels. I know a number of women who found a husband before the age of 25, and they were all able to do so because they made it priority. It's the ones who rode the cock carousel until the age of 35 and demand a billionaire gigachad descend from the heavens and marry them that are having issues, and they can go get fucked in the bed they made.