Today I learned photographic evidence dont real.
A picture of one tank of unspecified time in some location at some particular moment in time is proof positive that the 10+ Bradleys destroyed "lived". I can with as much evidence say that the Russians evacuated it and were cleaning it up to install it in front of the American embassy.
I mean, I could have linked to a news article, but all of them were shitting their pants and screaming how the end is neigh because they dont understand how to military. Because they news doesnt actually care as much as you think they do.
How interesting, could you tell me why the news would be "shitting [its] pants" due to what it views as Ukrainian defeats?
We call that "Operational Security" here in the West, but knowing how Eastoids fight their wars I wouldnt expect them to understand.
'Scuse me Sir, I'm a MIDDLE-Eastoid. Though we're not good at war either, we tend to lose them in six days. The Taliban which kicked the ass of the Americans are not Middle Easterners, after all.
Or do you forget that there was also not much about Kherson until there were Ukrainians marching in the streets
Did they take it by force? No. The Russian command just decided to retreat to more defensible borders. How does this redeem the not very impressive results of your 'counteroffensive'?
If I were you, I'd have said: "see, the Ukrainians sent thousands to die in a feint against Kherson, and after the Russian felt safe, they struck into Kharkov oblast". That would have made more sense than whatever this is.
Not so much Biden is tough. Just Putin is even weaker.
This is your mind on war propaganda. No disrespect.
I know, right? Now imagine how much more powerful we would be if we stopped doing deliberately retarded shit because we felt like it.
Maybe you'd have managed to beat the Taliban, instead of being utterly humiliated by guys wearing sandals, after spending trillions and thousands of lives.
But hey, at leaast Raytheon won, like it's winning the War of the Reconquest now.
Looks at the things the Soviets did to them over the course of 50 years.
It has nothing at all to do with "the things the Soviets did" and everything with simple balance of power. Russia could have been the most benevolent regional hegemon, and they'd have done the same thing.
Gee, I wonder why they all wanted to go join the "Fuck Russia" club
Huh, so you admit that NATO is the "fuck Russia club" and that expanding NATO is an act of aggression directed against the Russians. Thus, Russia is completely in the right to resist it as it is doing.
Correct. When you are weak, then the terms are dictated to you whether you like it or not. Especially when you are so weak you get wailed on by someone with one hand behind their back.
It didn't take much for your to rip off the mask of "we hate invasions!!!!" and "RUSSHER STARTED A WAR" and to admit that all your actions are just power plays. That someone victimized himself by the US regime would be such a fanatical, warmongering supporter of its expansion abroad is quite odd, but we all have our flaws.
And then it formalized it, expanded to eat the entire known world, and continued to live for over 1,000 years. Sounds like a good deal to me.
I respect that. You openly want to plunder the entire world, rather than hiding behind liberal pieties that your own regime routinely violates. What bothers me is that the constant lying on the part of the Americans about what they are doing. They go around killing millions of people, and then feign outrage over war and invasions. You just openly want to kill millions of people for your own profit (or so you think), which has been historically what empires have done, and is therefore worthy of respect quite aside from being commendable honesty.
Especially since I consider a Woke American Empire superior to anything China or Russia would offer me (I can at least get rid of the Woke and get new elites,
Optimistic.
Today I learned photographic evidence dont real.
A picture of one tank of unspecified time in some location at some particular moment in time is proof positive that the 10+ Bradleys destroyed "lived". I can with as much evidence say that the Russians evacuated it and were cleaning it up to install it in front of the American embassy.
I mean, I could have linked to a news article, but all of them were shitting their pants and screaming how the end is neigh because they dont understand how to military. Because they news doesnt actually care as much as you think they do.
How interesting, could you tell me why the news would be "shitting [its] pants" due to what it views as Ukrainian defeats?
We call that "Operational Security" here in the West, but knowing how Eastoids fight their wars I wouldnt expect them to understand.
'Scuse me Sir, I'm a MIDDLE-Eastoid. Though we're not good at war either, we tend to lose them in six days. The Taliban which kicked the ass of the Americans are not Middle Easterners, after all.
Or do you forget that there was also not much about Kherson until there were Ukrainians marching in the streets
Did they take it by force? No. The Russian command just decided to retreat to more defensible borders. How does this redeem the not very impressive results of your 'counteroffensive'?
If I were you, I'd have said: "see, the Ukrainians sent thousands to die in a feint against Kherson, and after the Russian felt safe, they struck into Kharkov oblast". That would have made more sense than whatever this is.
Not so much Biden is tough. Just Putin is even weaker.
This is your mind on war propaganda. No disrespect.
I know, right? Now imagine how much more powerful we would be if we stopped doing deliberately retarded shit because we felt like it.
Maybe you'd have managed to beat the Taliban, instead of being utterly humiliated by guys wearing sandals, after spending trillions and thousands of lives.
But hey, at leaast Raytheon won, like it's winning the War of the Reconquest now.
Looks at the things the Soviets did to them over the course of 50 years.
It has nothing at all to do with "the things the Soviets did" and everything with simple balance of power. Russia could have been the most benevolent regional hegemon, and they'd have done the same thing.
Gee, I wonder why they all wanted to go join the "Fuck Russia" club
Huh, so you admit that NATO is the "fuck Russia club" and that expanding NATO is an act of aggression directed against the Russians.
Correct. When you are weak, then the terms are dictated to you whether you like it or not. Especially when you are so weak you get wailed on by someone with one hand behind their back.
It didn't take much for your to rip off the mask of "we hate invasions!!!!" and "RUSSHER STARTED A WAR" and to admit that all your actions are just power plays. That someone victimized himself by the US regime would be such a fanatical, warmongering supporter of its expansion abroad is quite odd, but we all have our flaws.
And then it formalized it, expanded to eat the entire known world, and continued to live for over 1,000 years. Sounds like a good deal to me.
I respect that. You openly want to plunder the entire world, rather than hiding behind liberal pieties that your own regime routinely violates. What bothers me is that the constant lying on the part of the Americans about what they are doing. They go around killing millions of people, and then feign outrage over war and invasions. You just openly want to kill millions of people for your own profit (or so you think), which has been historically what empires have done, and is therefore worthy of respect quite aside from being commendable honesty.
Especially since I consider a Woke American Empire superior to anything China or Russia would offer me (I can at least get rid of the Woke and get new elites,
Optimistic.