He's also using clear, yes or no criteria.

"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."

I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".

If they fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.

He's also using clear, yes or no criteria.

"No pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study."

I'm sure there's many vaccine studies of various qualities and the real problem is we're not doing enough testing in general. But if he said something subjective like "we're not doing enough testing" they'd say fact check: false, here's what we're doing it's "enough" according to "medical experts".

If the fact-check "no pre-licensing placebo-controlled safety study" they either have to "fact-check: true, but..." or just outright lie.