If they're already conducting hidden experiments on whole populations to this degree, there's no guarantee that there's a simple division of 'real jab' vs 'saline' either. There could be different degrees of 'placebo', eg. saline vs empty LNP, different formulations of the mRNA just to see what happens (as in the blue batches which were mysteriously administered in lower numbers), anything. Everything is out the window - except for the certainty that the mRNA tech is much more dangerous than they admit, because they mixed a control group in with the real group which diluted the prevalence of adverse effects.

EDIT: This is actually huge for me because throughout all the 'bad batch' speculation I never got too interested, assuming that the 'bad' batches with most AEs were simply the biggest ones or that it might be a kind of #NotAllJabs damage control narrative (context: there are, I suspect, a lot of shills around these days trying to offer this or that reason why the jabs are not bad by definition, but that they were just bad due to mistakes this time). Now I realise they were actually the smallest batches, and that the largest batches were also pretty bad, and both were distributed along with tons of control jabs to dilute the danger signal, making it much more evil and calculated than I had imagined.

If they're already conducting hidden experiments on whole populations to this degree, there's no guarantee that there's a simple division of 'real jab' vs 'saline' either. There could be different degrees of 'placebo', eg. saline vs empty LNP, different formulations of the mRNA just to see what happens (as in the blue batches which were mysteriously administered in lower numbers), anything. Everything is out the window - except for the certainty that the mRNA tech is much more dangerous than they admit, because they mixed a control group in with the real group which diluted the prevalence of adverse effects.