Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The state of Missouri is about to commit a high crime against feminism by making it harder for women to deny fathers access to their children, and the whores are pissed. One of the dirty tricks women use to maximize the family court payout is about to become less viable.

“On the one hand, it can prevent some parents from being unreasonable when taking the kid away from a good parent,” said Adam Sommer, a family law attorney in Warrensburg and host of the progressive podcast Heartland Pod.

Yeah, that's the point you fucking retard. It's about making the dirty tricks you and the whores you represent harder to pull off.

“It also is going to — the flip side of that coin — is going to give abusers easier, quicker access to kids that I think is going to be an unfortunate byproduct of this.”

Translation: The false abuse accusations that you advise your female clients to make as a matter course won't be as effective, and you're angry because it reduces their payday and makes it harder for them to torture men now.

Under current law, judges decide custody cases by weighing the best interests of the child

Yes, and that standard is completely subjective. Given the anti-male bias in the family courts "best interest of the child" becomes "best interest of the woman" in practice. An objective standard makes this kind of dishonesty harder, which is why the feminists are so pissed.

After years of opposing the change, family law advocates worked with legislators on provisions updating the standards judges use to determine a child’s best interest in custody cases, including related to domestic violence.

It sounds like father's rights groups have been making headway, and the bad actors protecting evil whores changed tactics to try to preserve the house of horrors that they've turned the family courts into.

Women lost custody 28% of the time they reported abuse, she found — potentially putting children in harm’s way.

Put another way, 72% of the time they were rewarded for what were most likely false allegations that women routinely use to get the upper hand in family court. The 28% represents cases where the lying was so blatant that even the notoriously corrupt family courts called them on their shit. What would really put this statistic in perspective is how often the fathers lost custody after reporting the mother's abuse of the kids.

1 year ago
3 score
Reason: Original

The state of Missouri is about to commit a high crime against feminism by making it harder for women to deny fathers access to their children, and the whores are pissed. One of the dirty tricks women use to maximize the family court payout is about to become less viable.

“On the one hand, it can prevent some parents from being unreasonable when taking the kid away from a good parent,” said Adam Sommer, a family law attorney in Warrensburg and host of the progressive podcast Heartland Pod.

Yeah, that's the point you fucking retard. It's about making the dirty tricks you and the whores you represent harder to pull off.

“It also is going to — the flip side of that coin — is going to give abusers easier, quicker access to kids that I think is going to be an unfortunate byproduct of this.”

Translation: The false abuse accusations that you advise your female clients to make as a matter course won't be as effective, and you're angry because it reduces their payday and makes it harder for them to torture men now.

Under current law, judges decide custody cases by weighing the best interests

Yes, and that standard is completely subjective. Given the anti-male bias in the family courts "best interest of the child" becomes "best interest of the woman" in practice. An objective standard makes this kind of dishonesty harder, which is why the feminists are so pissed.

After years of opposing the change, family law advocates worked with legislators on provisions updating the standards judges use to determine a child’s best interest in custody cases, including related to domestic violence.

It sounds like father's rights groups have been making headway, and the bad actors protecting evil whores changed tactics to try to preserve the house of horrors that they've turned the family courts into.

Women lost custody 28% of the time they reported abuse, she found — potentially putting children in harm’s way.

Put another way, 72% of the time they were rewarded for what were most likely false allegations that women routinely use to get the upper hand in family court. The 28% represents cases where the lying was so blatant that even the notoriously corrupt family courts called them on their shit. What would really put this statistic in perspective is how often the fathers lost custody after reporting the mother's abuse of the kids.

1 year ago
1 score