I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of any ond person's view of personal liberties. In essence, the way this is framed is that being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, and immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable when asked this question.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy to end abuse? Do you value your privacy more than battered women?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of any ond person's view of personal liberties. In essence, the way this is framed is that being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, and immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable when asked this question.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy to end abuse?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of any ond person's view of personal liberties. In essence, the way this is framed is that being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, and immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable when asked this question.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy for social brownie points?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of any ond person's view of personal liberties. In essence, the way this is framed is that being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, and immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy for social brownie points?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of any ond person's view of personal liberties. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy for social brownie points?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of personal liberties. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
Ergo, the real question is "Would you relinquish your privacy for social brownie points?". The figure of 33% should surprise no one.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one if you thought this was some face value assessment of personal liberties. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
I think you'd be underestimating the polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed and loaded including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
I think you'd be underestimating the dualistic polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capital. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
I think you'd be underestimating the dualistic polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it immediately becomes an accusation that lowers social capitol. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
I think you'd be underestimating the dualistic polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse, it becomes an accusation. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.
I think you'd be underestimating the dualistic polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable because the opposite becomes an accusation.
I think you'd be underestimating the dualistic polarities gen z and late-millenials have been exposed to with regards to how questions tend to be framed including this one. In essence, being opposed is synonymous with supporting abuse. That 33% has been conditioned think the two are interchangeable.