There is nothing magical about sugar from fruit, cane or corn.

Pointing the finger at any single one is just avoiding something Westerners seem incapable to face : "you're fat because you eat too much". East Asians aren't typically fat, yet their diet is high carbs with delicious high carbs sauces to season it.

Sugar is energy. Excess energy is stored as fat. Consume less energy than your body needs to function and you'll lose weight. The retort to that is "you can't expect people not to stuff their face at any hint of hunger when they have food tyat taistes good avaliable, and my my restrictive diet with food taboos will fix that so you'll never over-eat." Okay then, do that if it works for you.

People get lost in trying to figure the magical diet, exercise, protein/fat/carbonhydrates( sugars ). Just eat less. Mesure with a food scale, calories per X gram is at the tip of the fingers on a tablet or keyboard.

The "insulin hypothesis" guru had his own study invalidate his hypothesis ( results = weight loss is predictable based on caloric intake / predicted caloric deficit alone, not sugar % of said caloric intake ).

But he still insists he's right.

There is nothing magical about sugar from fruit, cane or corn.

Pointing the finger at any single one is just avoiding something Westerners seem incapable to face : "you're fat because you eat too much".

Sugar is energy. Excess energy is stored as fat. Consume less energy than your body needs to function and you'll lose weight. The retort to that is "you can't expect people not to stuff their face at any hint of hunger when they have food tyat taistes good avaliable, and my my restrictive diet with food taboos will fix that so you'll never over-eat." Okay then, do that if it works for you.

People get lost in trying to figure the magical diet, exercise, protein/fat/carbonhydrates( sugars ). Just eat less. Mesure with a food scale, calories per X gram is at the tip of the fingers on a tablet or keyboard.

The "insulin hypothesis" guru had his own study invalidate his hypothesis ( results = weight loss is predictable based on caloric intake / predicted caloric deficit alone, not sugar % of said caloric intake ).

But he still insists he's right.

There is nothing magical about sugar from fruit, cane or corn.

Pointing the finger at any single one is just avoiding something Westerners seem incapable to face : "you're fat because you eat too much".

Sugar is energy. Excess energy is stored as fat. Consume less energy than your body needs to function and you'll lose weight. The retort to that is "you can't expect people not to stuff their face at any hint of hunger, and my my diet will fix that so you'll never over-eat." Okay then, do that if it works for you.

People get lost in trying to figure the magical diet, exercise, protein/fat/carbonhydrates( sugars ). Just eat less. Mesure with a food scale, calories per X gram is at the tip of the fingers on a tablet or keyboard.

The "insulin hypothesis" guru had his own study invalidate his hypothesis ( results = weight loss is predictable based on caloric intake / predicted caloric deficit alone, not sugar % of said caloric intake ).

But he still insists he's right.

There is nothing magical about sugar from fruit, cane or corn.

Pointing the finger at any single one is just avoiding something Westerners seem incapable to face : "you're fat because you eat too much".

Sugar is energy. Excess energy is stored as fat. Consume less energy than your body needs to function and you'll lose weight.

People get lost in trying to figure the magical diet, exercise, protein/fat/carbonhydrates( sugars ). Just eat less. Mesure with a food scale, calories per X gram is at the tip of the fingers on a tablet or keyboard.

The "insulin hypothesis" guru had his own study invalidate his hypothesis ( results = weight loss is predictable based on caloric intake / predicted caloric deficit alone, not sugar % of said caloric intake ).

But he still insists he's right.