"Having gone through male puberty" is not provable and is not a standard. They tried to sound reasonable by embedding the real reason for having segregated sports into the rule, but they actually just weakened their own position by creating a rule with too much leeway.

Ban men. Easy. You think it is hard because you are accepting a political premise and conceding ground. You've already lost all future battles as a result because you've betrayed weakness to an enemy whose "cupidity does not sleep."

Women's sports have always existed with fragility, walking perpetually with the specter of having many roads to self-demise open and easily started upon. Lesser product receives lesser attention and withers, parasites itself onto a more successful enterprise (men's league profit sharing), leans into leftism because it's already functionally welfare and wealth-redistribution so the fit is natural, and then leftism destroys it by prying open an anus through which all standards are equalized (which is to say abolished).

Choosing to die on the hill of equality when the basic premise of the endeavor was inequality to start, is acceptably poetic. Carry on.

"Having gone through male puberty" is not provable and is not a standard. They tried to sound reasonable by embedding the real reason for having segregated sports into the rule, but they actually just weakened their own position by creating a rule with too much leeway.

Ban men. Easy. You think it is hard because you are accepting a political premise and conceding ground. You've already lost all future battles as a result because you've betrayed weakness to an enemy whose "cupidity does not sleep."

Women's sports have always existed with fragility, existing perpetually with the specter of having many roads to self-demise open and easily started upon. Lesser product receives lesser attention and withers, parasites itself onto a more successful enterprise (men's league profit sharing), leans into leftism because it's already functionally welfare and wealth-redistribution so the fit is natural, and then leftism destroys it by prying open an anus through which all standards are equalized (which is to say abolished).

Choosing to die on the hill of equality when the basic premise of the endeavor was inequality to start, is acceptably poetic. Carry on.

"Having gone through male puberty" is not provable and is not a standard. They tried to sound reasonable by embedding the real reason for having segregated sports into the rule, but they actually just weakened their own position by creating a rule with too much leeway.

Ban men. Easy. You think it is hard because you are accepting a political premise and conceding ground. You've already lost all future battles as a result because you've betrayed weakness to an enemy whose "cupidity does not sleep."

Women's sports are stupid in the same way the Special Olympics are stupid. It was always a "choose your own demise" situation. Lesser product receives lesser attention and withers, parasites itself onto a more successful enterprise (men's league profit sharing), leans into leftism because it's already functionally welfare and wealth-redistribution so the fit is natural, and then leftism destroys it by prying open an anus through which all standards are equalized (which is to say abolished).

Choosing to die on the hill of equality when the basic premise of the endeavor was inequality to start, is acceptably poetic. Carry on.