Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.

For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.

In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "some is being mean to me!" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they do they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).

I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)

(Going on a particularly wild tangent, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)

Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).

Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.

For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.

In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "some is being mean to me!" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they will they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).

I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)

(Going on a particularly wild tangent, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)

Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).

Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.

For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.

In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "you are being mean to me" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they will they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).

I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)

(Going on a particularly wild tangent, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)

Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).

Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than those in East Asian countries.

For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.

In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "you are being mean to me" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they will they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).

I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)

(Going on a particularly wild tanged, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)

Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).

Unfortunately, I don't see Western countries going down the path of East Asian countries with respect to feminism. To put it bluntly, men in Western countries are far more cucked than does in Asian countries.

For example, although there are both East Asian "traditionalists" and Western "traditionalists", they differ on how they perceive women. While both "traditionalists" have some stereotypes about women in common, for example, they might perceive to be less physically violent, and better at providing care for others (including children), East Asian "traditionalists" also perceive women as being incompetent (i.e. almost useless) in male-dominated areas, while many Western "traditionalists" perceive women as being "equal" to men in these areas, or at least only slightly inferior.

In addition, all it takes in a Western country is for a women to say "you are being mean to me" and most of the men come running "Oh no, milady, how can we defend your honour?" and feel they are doing a "good deed" by kowtowing to women. In contrast, men East Asian countries may still help the women, but if they will they will be shaking their heads, "How useless are women? Always needing help". In other words, Western traditionalists are more gynocentric than East Asian ones. (This is related to the previous point as well, as the reason Western men aren't willing to perceive women in the same way as East Asian men is because they are more gynocentric).

I suspect a lot of this differences is historical. The whole idea of "romantic love" and bastardised gynocentric version of chivalry is Western in origin. For example, Western courtship rituals involve men demonstrating their subservience to women (e.g getting down on a knee to propose to the women)

(Going on a particularly wild tanged, it's fun to speculate how these cultural differences might have evolved. It could have pure chance, of course, but I myself speculate that it might have something to do with white women having evolved to be more sexually appealing than women from other cultures, supercharging their ability to manipulate men. Speculative evidence for this would be how men of all cultures generally perceive white women to be the most attractive.)

Finally, note that I deliberately used "East Asian" here, as I feel I know enough about East Asians to comment. I don't know enough about, for example, Indian culture to comment, but my perception is that Indians may be as gynocentric as Westerners, if not more so (accepting the latter will work against my speculation in the preceding paragraph).