Poor argument in the graphic.

Sure, I don't like what's being communicated by the top image either. But it's abundantly clear that it isn't in any way analogous to having some retarded degenerate telling little boys that they might be 'happier' if they try emulating little girls and describing sexual activity of a deviant kind and in explicit detail to children, and so forth. These kids will be confused and guilty about any opposite sex attraction that they might have even in the least worst case scenario. No wonder something like 15% of the American generation born after 2000 are now identifying as LGBT (as opposed to something like 5% of the boomers): keep that up and you'll become a majority, as you so desire, in a few more generations.

The choice of photo is also obviously loaded and propagandistic: notice that the bottom photo is full of parents, sending the false message that there's safeguards, responsibility, &c. 'Like, only bigots think that kids would be left alone with drag queens, we aren't that irresponsible!' Almost every photo of these losers looks more offensive than one chosen here: a teacher might be the only other adult visible in most of them. Similarly, the use of 'may be present' is loaded language: schools and libraries are not places where children may be present (may, implying that it may be fraction of a percent possible that children may be in such environments), but are, with practically 100% certainty.

Poor argument in the graphic.

Sure, I don't like what's being communicated by the top image either. But it's abundantly clear that it isn't in any way analogous to having some retarded degenerate telling little boys that they might be 'happier' if they try emulating little girls and describing sexual activity of a deviant kind and in explicit detail to children, and so forth. These kids will be confused and guilty about any opposite sex attraction that they might have even in the least worst case scenario. No wonder something like 15% of the American generation born after 2000 are now identifying as LGBT (as opposed to something like 5% of the boomers): keep that up and you'll become a majority, as you so desire, in a few more generations.

The choice of photo is also obviously loaded and propagandistic: notice that the bottom photo is full of parents, sending the false message that there's safeguards, responsibility, &c. 'Like, only bigots think that kids would be left alone with drag queens, we aren't that irresponsible!' Almost every photo of these losers looks more offensive than one chosen here: a teacher might be the only other adult visible in most of them. Similarly, the use of 'may be present' is loaded language: schools and libraries are not places where children may be present (may, implying that a fraction of a percent is possible some of the time), but are.