destroy the industry you're using to train that AI in the first place.
My moral issues with the datasets they were trained on aside, this is the other big concern yes, that it will become recursive. Not just art, but everything we do. Oh sure we can create a new painting in the existing style of x. But nobody will spend the decades of building their skills to be able to create new style y. Not when the market is flooded by infinite free art far better than you can produce for the first 20 years, when previously it was a viable side-earner after a few years.
Conservativism in this is not a vice. There are some real concerns here, for art and for society more broadly. All industries.
And that's before we get into the biases that sillicon valley and the gov is putting into AI. The last thing anyone here should want is AI being developed here and now. During peak woke? Are you fucking insane?
"Paizo stands with artists and writers against progress."?
Good.
destroy the industry you're using to train that AI in the first place.
My moral issues with the datasets they were trained on aside, this is the other big concern yes, that it will become recursive. Not just art, but everything we do. Oh sure we can create a new painting in the style of x. But nobody will spend the decades of building their skills to be able to create style y. Not when the market is flooded by infinite free art far better than you can produce for the first 20 years, when previously it was a viable side-earner after a few years.
Conservativism in this is not a vice. There are some real concerns here, for art and for society more broadly. All industries.
And that's before we get into the biases that sillicon valley and the gov is putting into AI. The last thing anyone here should want is AI being developed here and now. During peak woke? Are you fucking insane?
"Paizo stands with artists and writers against progress."?
Good.
destroy the industry you're using to train that AI in the first place.
My moral issues with the datasets they were trained on aside, this is the other big concern yes, that it will become recursive. Not just art, but everything we do. Oh sure we can create a new painting in the style of x. But nobody will spend the decades of building their skills to be able to create style y. Not when the market is flooded by infinite free art far better than you can produce for the first 20 years, when previously it was a viable side-earner after a few years.
Conservativism in this is not a vice. There are some real concerns here, for art and for society more broadly. All industries.
And that's before we get into the biases that sillicon valley and the gov is putting into AI. The last thing anyone here should want is AI being developed here and now. During peak woke? Are you fucking insane?
Paizo stands with artists and writers against progress.
Good.
destroy the industry you're using to train that AI in the first place.
My moral issues with the datasets they were trained on aside, this is the other big concern yes, that it will become recursive. Not just art, but everything we do. Oh sure we can create a new painting in the style of x. But nobody will spend the decades of building their skills to be able to create style y. Not when the market is flooded by infinite free art far better than you can produce for the first 20 years, when previously it was a viable side-earner after a few years.
Conservativism in this is not a vice. There are some real concerns here, for art and for society more broadly. All industries.
And that's before we get into the biases that sillicon valley and the gov is putting into AI. The last thing anyone here should want is AI being developed here and now. During peak woke? Are you fucking insane?