Weren't the Russians, including but not limited to the former Ukrainian "own people" who decided to attack their own country, using cities "as shield" for the incidents that you whined about? Or was it happening in demilitarized areas, like Paris 1940? I really don't understand your rhetoric here at all.

Similar thing happened to for example Rubizhne earlier, and to Mariinka all year long (in addition to earlier years' attacks). Mariinka looks like WWI frontline cities, it's literally leveled, erased from existence and a moonscape.

And Russia bombed and shelled Russia (Chechnya in particular) extremely heavily with all sorts of weapons many years before they even started any trouble in Ukraine by arming the rebels and sending in the soldiers in unmarked uniforms while lying and denying about everything.

Which is also what they did in Chechnya, because the feds started the intervention (and it was an intervention, across an established border) with unmarked vehicles and soldiers pretending to be Chechens (beard and all). These guys got just slaughtered (well, many got captured, later released as a Chechen gesture or goodwill to Moscow), but hardly anyone even noticed. It was before the main invasion, a mission to do a coup in Grozny, organised by the FSK (KGB befor eit became FSB). Something like in Crimea, or Kabul earlier, only a total disaster. It's little known but really fascinating. Look it up. Moscow also lied to Grozny they're not going to invade if their guys are to be released, similar to their more recent lies in and about Ukraine, including in the run up to February 24 when they were lying how they're not going to invade. They just lie always, all the time. This is why there's the saying "never believe in anything until the Kremlin denied it".

America didn't aid Saddam with chemical weapons, the Egyptians did (having previously done it in Yemen, using Soviet-supplied chemical weapons against the Yemeni royalists). I already told you about it, you forget it was me and you're still peddiling retarded lies like nothing happned.

Yanukovych fled to Moscow with stolen money just because he wanted the stolen money. Notice how he didn't leave to his own supporters, and never showed up in Ukraine ever since. It's because his former supporters, even these who became rebels and collaborators, regard him as a thief and a traitor, and it's THEY who would just murder him if they could. His return under Russian protection (from them) would also demoralise them. They hate him the most.

Poroshenko didn't run "on peace platform" at all (wtf), and your "terrorizing" aka conflict came from both sides, as Ukraine began to resist.

I wish we (Poland) did Nord Stream. But in reality probably Russians did, which is anticlimactic.

Weren't the Russians, including but not limited to the former Ukrainian "own people" who decided to attack their own country, using cities "as shield" for the incidents that you whined about? Or was it happening in demilitarized areas, like Paris 1940? I really don't understand your rhetoric here at all.

Similar thing happened to for example Rubizhne earlier, and to Mariinka all year long (in addition to earlier years' attacks). Mariinka looks like WWI frontline cities, it's literally leveled, erased from existence and a moonscape.

And Russia bombed and shelled Russia (Chechnya in particular) extremely heavily with all sorts of weapons many years before they even started any trouble in Ukraine by arming the rebels and sending in the soldiers in unmarked uniforms while lying and denying about everything.

Which is also what they did in Chechnya, because the feds started the intervention (and it was an intervention, across an established border) with unmarked vehicles and soldiers pretending to be Chechens (beard and all). These guys got just slaughtered (well, many got captured, later released as a Chechen gesture or goodwill to Moscow), but hardly anyone even noticed. It was before the main invasion, a mission to do a coup in Grozny, organised by the FSK (KGB befor eit became FSB). Something like in Crimea, or Kabul earlier, only a total disaster. It's little known but really fascinating. Look it up. Moscow also lied to Grozny they're not going to invade if their guys are to be released, similar to their more recent lies in and about Ukraine, including in the run up to February 24 when they were lying how they're not going to invade. They just lie always, all the time. This is why there's the saying "never believe in anything until the Kremlin denied it".

America didn't aid Saddam with chemical weapons, the Egyptians did (having previously done it in Yemen, using Soviet-supplied chemical weapons). I already told you about it, you forget it was me and you're still peddiling retarded lies like nothing happned.

Yanukovych fled to Moscow with stolen money just because he wanted the stolen money. Notice how he didn't leave to his own supporters, and never showed up in Ukraine ever since. It's because his former supporters, even these who became rebels and collaborators, regard him as a thief and a traitor, and it's THEY who would just murder him if they could. His return under Russian protection (from them) would also demoralise them. They hate him the most.

Poroshenko didn't run "on peace platform" at all (wtf), and your "terrorizing" aka conflict came from both sides, as Ukraine began to resist.

I wish we (Poland) did Nord Stream. But in reality probably Russians did, which is anticlimactic.

Weren't the Russians, including but not limited to the former Ukrainian "own people" who decided to attack their own country, using cities "as shield" for the incidents that you whined about? Or was it happening in demilitarized areas, like Paris 1940? I really don't understand your rhetoric here at all.

Similar thing happened to for example Rubizhne earlier, and to Mariinka all year long (in addition to earlier years' attacks). Mariinka looks like WWI frontline cities, it's literally leveled, erased from existence and a moonscape.

And Russia bombed and shelled Russia (Chechnya in particular) extremely heavily with all sorts of weapons many years before they even started any trouble in Ukraine by arming the rebels and sending in the soldiers in unmarked uniforms while lying and denying about everything.

Which is also what they did in Chechnya, because the feds started the intervention (and it was an intervention, across an established border) with unmarked vehicles and soldiers pretending to be Chechens (beard and all). These guys got just slaughtered (well, many got captured, later released as a Chechen gesture or goodwill to Moscow), but hardly anyone even noticed. It was before the main invasion, a mission to do a coup in Grozny, organised by the FSK (KGB befor eit became FSB). Something like in Crimea, or Kabul earlier, only a total disaster. It's little known but really fascinating. Look it up. Moscow also lied to Grozny they're not going to invade if their guys are to be released, similar to their more recent lies in and about Ukraine, including in the run up to February 24 when they were lying how they're not going to invade. They just lie always, all the time. This is why there's the saying "never believe in anything until the Kremlin denied it".

America didn't aid Saddam with chemical weapons, the Egyptians did (having previously done it in Yemen, using Soviet-supplied chemical weapons). I already told you about it, you forget it was me and you're still peddiling retarded lies like nothing happned.

Yanukovych fled to Moscow with stolen money just because he wanted the stolen money. Notice how he didn't leave to his own supporters, and never showed up in Ukraine ever since. It's because his former supporters, even these who became rebels and collaborators, regard him as a thief and a traitor, and it's THEY who would just murder him if they could. His return under Russian protection (from them) would also demoralise them. They hate him the most.

Poroshenko didn't run "on peace platform" at all (wtf), and your "terrorizing" aka conflict came from both sides, as Ukraine began to resist. He run as a hardliner to begin an "Anti-Terrorist Operation" (Soviet term, also used by Russia for Chechnya) in what soon became the "ATO Zone".

I wish we (Poland) did Nord Stream. But in reality probably Russians did, which is anticlimactic.

Weren't the Russians, including but not limited to the former Ukrainian "own people" who decided to attack their own country, using cities "as shield" for the incidents that you whined about? Or was it happening in demilitarized areas, like Paris 1940? I really don't understand your rhetoric here at all.

Similar thing happened to for example Rubizhne earlier, and to Mariinka all year long (in addition to earlier years' attacks). Mariinka looks like WWI frontline cities, it's literally leveled, erased from existence and a moonscape.

And Russia bombed and shelled Russia (Chechnya in particular) extremely heavily with all sorts of weapons many years before they even started any trouble in Ukraine by arming the rebels and sending in the soldiers in unmarked uniforms while lying and denying about everything.

Which is also what they did in Chechnya, because the feds started the intervention (and it was an intervention, across an established border) with unmarked vehicles and soldiers pretending to be Chechens (beard and all). These guys got just slaughtered (well, many got captured, later released as a Chechen gesture or goodwill to Moscow), but hardly anyone even noticed. It was before the main invasion, a mission to do a coup in Grozny, organised by the FSK (KGB befor eit became FSB). Something like in Crimea, or Kabul earlier, only a total disaster. It's little known but really fascinating. Look it up. Moscow also lied to Grozny they're not going to invade if their guys are to be released, similar to their more recent lies in and about Ukraine, including in the run up to February 24 when they were lying how they're not going to invade. They just lie always, all the time. This is why there's the saying "never believe in anything until the Kremlin denied it".

America didn't aid Saddam with chemical weapons, the Egyptians did (having previously done it in Yemen, using Soviet-supplied chemical weapons). I already told you about it, you forget it was me and you're still peddiling retarded lies like nothing happned.

Yanukovych fled to Moscow with stolen money just because he wanted the stolen money. Notice how he didn't leave to his own supporters, and never showed up in Ukraine ever since. It's because his former supporters, even these who became rebels and collaborators, regard him as a thief and a traitor, and it's THEY who would just murder him if they could. His return under Russian protection (from them) would also demoralise them. They hate him the most.

Poroshenko didn't run "on peace platform" at all (wtf), and your "terrorizing" aka conflict came from both sides, as Ukraine began to resist.

I wish we (Poland) did Nord Stream. But in reality probably Russians did, which is anticlimactic.

Weren't the Russians, including but not limited to the former Ukrainian "own people" who decided to attack their own country, using cities "as shield" for the incidents that you whined about? Or was it happening in demilitarized areas, like Paris 1940? I really don't understand your rhetoric here at all.

Similar thing happened to for example Rubizhne earlier, and to Mariinka all year long (in addition to earlier years' attacks). Mariinka looks like WWI frontline cities, it's literally leveled, erased from existence and a moonscape.

And Russia bombed and shelled Russia (Chechnya in particular) extremely heavily with all sorts of weapons many years before they even started any trouble in Ukraine by arming the rebels and sending in the soldiers in unmarked uniforms while lying and denying about everything.

Which is also what they did in Chechnya, because the feds started the intervention (and it was an intervention, across an established border) with unmarked vehicles and soldiers pretending to be Chechens (beard and all). These guys got just slaughtered (well, many got captured, later released as a Chechen gesture or goodwill to Moscow), but hardly anyone even noticed. It was before the main invasion, a mission to do a coup in Grozny, organised by the FSK (KGB befor eit became FSB). Something like in Crimea, or Kabul earlier, only a total disaster. It's little known but really fascinating. Look it up. Moscow also lied to Grozny they're not going to invade if their guys are to be released, similar to their more recent lies in and about Ukraine, including in the run up to February 24 when they were lying how they're not going to invade. They just lie always, all the time. This is why there's the saying "never believe in anything until the Kremlin denied it".

America didn't aid Saddam with chemical weapons, the Egyptians did (having previously done it in Yemen, using Soviet-supplied chemical weapons). I already told you about it, you forget it was me and you're still peddiling retarded lies like nothing happned.

Yanukovych fled to Moscow with stolen money just because he wanted the stolen money. Notice how he didn't leave to his own supporters, and never showed up in Ukraine ever since. It's because his former supporters, even these who became rebels and collaborators, regard him as a thief and a traitor, and it's THEY who would just murder him if they could. His return would also demoralise them. They hate him the most.

Poroshenko didn't run "on peace platform" at all (wtf), and your "terrorizing" aka conflict came from both sides, as Ukraine began to resist.

I wish we (Poland) did Nord Stream. But in reality probably Russians did, which is anticlimactic.