First thought? Archive that shit.

That Sub-Zero one was pretty funny. As was the linked Batman/Catwoman swap.

But it's nonsense, as others have mentioned. The Catwoman/Batman swap, while funny, is just disingenuous to the extreme. They're completely different characters. Batman is basically the definition of stoic and brooding, while Catwoman plays up her flirtatiousness and sex appeal. You could easily switch the roles of the sexes and still have it work, just not the characters like that; you could have as serious and down-to-business female, and a more flamboyant male and it would be fine. But Batman is Batman, and Catwoman is Catwoman. It has nothing to do with sex.

They also had a pinned Roe V Wade post, because of course they did.

EDIT: Also, looks like an especially high ratio of faggots and libtards, even for Reddit.

First thought? Archive that shit.

That Sub-Zero one was pretty funny. As was the linked Batman/Catwoman swap.

But it's nonsense, as others have mentioned. The Catwoman/Batman swap, while funny, is just disingenuous to the extreme. They're completely different characters. Batman is basically the definition of stoic and brooding, while Catwoman plays up her flirtatiousness and sex appeal. You could easily switch the roles of the sexes and still have it work, just not the characters like that; you could have as serious and down-to-business female, and a more flamboyant male and it would be fine. But Batman is Batman, and Catwoman is Catwoman. It has nothing to do with sex.

They also had a pinned Roe V Wade post, because of course they did.