Guy likes the USA: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes the USA: "this is not a democracy" Guy who likes NK: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes NK: "this is not a democracy"

By George this is just the strangest phenomenon. Come on. It is clearly a buzzword. I have used it in proper with the popular lexicon wherein its only coherency the the concept of vote casting. You are practicing pilpul to avoid my argument.

what was your original meaning?

Really asking me to retype this shit huh. Why don't you reread it instead, since I already typed it. Wowzers, efficiency galore.

You don't care and probably didnt read any in the first place. You'll reply to me with some snazzy last word pilpul, and I will call it again ad infinitum

The ability for a genuine democracy to operate runs downriver from its economic function. And I'm stressing "genuine" as a qualifier, not trying to slip it in unnoticed. See democracy in african "countries" versus the lifecycle of American democracy. Now the thing that disgusts me about your attitude, is the assumption of democracy as both a goal and a lost cause, and how we must all turn to hippy dippy economic floof promises that progress one way or another into underclass starvation and slaughter. Say what you want about the American system, but the height of what Americans have enjoyed and how greatly our masters have shaped the world is the stuff of historical legend. It happened so close to the British Empire that it will outshine even that People in the future will talk about the rise and fall of the Roman Republic (a capitalistic democracy) and the United States of America, and the iterations of empires that happened in their growth and in their wake (coming soon in our case, one would imagine). It's just gonna crumble into a "dictatorship" (Empire), crumble further, and spring up in some new form. All that matters is the money when that happens. It must be based on a commodity, the rest will form itself around that, laying in wait for the next Big Dupe to keep the cycle of entropy going. I don't like talking about a preferred system like it is a football team. To be honest, if YOU were King of the World and could implement whatever system you wanted, but the bean counters in a utopia of your design were competently game-locked, the rest would fall into place without your consent in function and, save for the event of my total failure, I would be left exactly where I am now laboring for basic needs and bitching about Worst Thing.

Guy likes the USA: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes the USA: "this is not a democracy" Guy who likes NK: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes NK: "this is not a democracy"

By George this is just the strangest phenomenon. Come on. It is clearly a buzzword. I have used it in proper with the popular lexicon wherein its only coherency the the concept of vote casting. You are practicing pilpul to avoid my argument.

what was your original meaning?

Really asking me to retype this shit huh. Why don't you reread it instead, since I already typed it. Wowzers, efficiency galore.

The ability for a genuine democracy to operate runs downriver from its economic function. And I'm stressing "genuine" as a qualifier, not trying to slip it in unnoticed. See democracy in african "countries" versus the lifecycle of American democracy. Now the thing that disgusts me about your attitude, is the assumption of democracy as both a goal and a lost cause, and how we must all turn to hippy dippy economic floof promises that progress one way or another into underclass starvation and slaughter. Say what you want about the American system, but the height of what Americans have enjoyed and how greatly our masters have shaped the world is the stuff of historical legend. It happened so close to the British Empire that it will outshine even that People in the future will talk about the rise and fall of the Roman Republic (a capitalistic democracy) and the United States of America, and the iterations of empires that happened in their growth and in their wake (coming soon in our case, one would imagine). It's just gonna crumble into a "dictatorship" (Empire), crumble further, and spring up in some new form. All that matters is the money when that happens. It must be based on a commodity, the rest will form itself around that, laying in wait for the next Big Dupe to keep the cycle of entropy going. I don't like talking about a preferred system like it is a football team. To be honest, if YOU were King of the World and could implement whatever system you wanted, but the bean counters in a utopia of your design were competently game-locked, the rest would fall into place without your consent in function and, save for the event of my total failure, I would be left exactly where I am now laboring for basic needs and bitching about Worst Thing.

Guy likes the USA: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes the USA: "this is not a democracy" Guy who likes NK: "this is a democracy" Guy who dislikes NK: "this is not a democracy"

By George this is just the strangest phenomenon. Come on. It is clearly a buzzword. I have used it in proper with the popular lexicon wherein its only coherency the the concept of vote casting. You are practicing pilpul to avoid my argument.