Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I instead offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

I think I'd rather play as dirty as everyone else.

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees that I lose my craft and way of life, with the promise of an aesthetically lacking culture abound, but also imposes the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare onto what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I instead offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

I think I'd rather play as dirty as everyone else.

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees that I lose my craft and way of life, and an aesthetically lacking culture abound, but also imposes the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare onto what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I instead offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

I think I'd rather play as dirty as everyone else.

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposes the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare onto what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

I think I'd rather play as dirty as everyone else.

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposes the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare onto what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

I think I'd rather play as dirty as everyone else.

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus? uwu

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable? Should I offer you my wife? Should I hang my head and gwumpus?* uwu

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of artistic meritocracy? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also imposing the exact nepotistic troon stranglehold that turned my industry into an adult daycare on what might have been the last bastion of meritocracy of craft? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aesthetically lacking culture but also the exact troon nepotism on what might have been the last bastion of meritocracy of craft? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, knowing that this not only guarantees an aestheticslly lacking culture but also the exact troon nepotism on what might have been the last bastion of meritocracy of craft? Why would I not be rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL! FOr FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE~~" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :) There's nothing you can do lmao! Thanks for the 10+ years of samples ROFL" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization knowledgeably sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to wave around some bastardization sampled from my work and say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you, rallying right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over if you were mainstream. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you right along with everyone thinking the exact same thing?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

Why would I not make this difficult for you?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute portion of a cloud with a royalty on it could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not then retort "pay up, tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not retort "pay up, tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" - (like I see everywhere to the point where the agenda sticks out because nobody gives enough of a shit about artists this much to blackpill and concernpost about them this much) then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not retort "pay up, tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not retort "pay up, tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

Why on earth would I not retort "pay up tranny"?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their image collections on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their images on gumroad - invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Even the most minute cloud with a royalty could screw you over. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their images on gumroad - this invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Your task is essentially Sisyphean

It has the potential to be, but I imagine Sisyphus is quite happy with himself. All those wonderful pools of sample collection will become like a frog-nail on the slip n' slide since legal cowardice is part of running a site. Deviantart proved that to some extent.

Handful of the most in-demand doing this is enough to knock the programming socks off half this rhetoric.

Do it. Seriously.

It already exists as far as I am aware, back in 2014~ artists would get struck down by pulling images off google for photobashing. Many of the higher folk went on to do their own photography and sold their images on gumroad - this invigorating both ends.

Though I would rather see AI starve, because if you get to say "fuck artists lol! just take the blackpill :)" then by what right do you not expect to get slapped upside the head if it is possible if not probable?

1 year ago
1 score