Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Oh it is undoubtedly quite artificial and individual how they looked at it, 100%. However, I don't see a good way that they can test for it otherwise. But then I also don't see that the state level systemic stuff needs much testing when you can just examine policy. You want to examine its effects sure, but it's certain that it exists. This is new then, whereas the evidence for the state level stuff just needs cataloguing. So this is my view in many ways even more useful because now we can show evidence for all levels of discrimination, at the system state level and personal. Any state policies or advertisements that help promote it as an identity can in fact now even be tied to causing personal level grief also.

They were wrong to ignore the state discrimination (and to propose more of it even in the discussion), but we've at least got some interesting data here.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Oh it is undoubtedly quite artificial and individual how they looked at it, 100%. I don't see a good way that they can test it otherwise. But then I also don't see that the state level systemic needs much testing when you can just examine policy. You want to examine its effects sure, but it's certain that it exists. This is new whereas the evidence for the state level stuff just needs cataloguing. So this is my view in many ways even more useful because now we can show evidence for all levels of discrimination, at the system state level and personal. Any state policies or advertisements that help promote it as an identity can in fact now even be tied to causing personal level grief also.

They were wrong to ignore the state discrimination (and to propose more of it even in the discussion), but we've at least got some interesting data here.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Oh it is undoubtedly quite artificial and individual how they looked at it, 100%. I don't see a good way that they can test it otherwise. But then I also don't see that the state level systemic needs much testing when you can just examine policy. You want to examine its effects sure, but it's certain that it exists. This is new whereas the evidence for the state level stuff just needs cataloguing. So this is my view in many ways even more useful because now we can show evidence for all levels of discrimination, at the system state level and personal. Any state policies or advertisements that help promote it as an identity can in fact now even be tied to causing personal level grief also. We already have that evidence of state discrimination

They were wrong to ignore the state discrimination (and to propose more of it even in the discussion), but we've at least got some interesting data here.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Oh it is undoubtedly quite artificial and individual how they looked at it, 100%. I don't see a good way that they can test it otherwise. But then don't see that it needs testing when you can just examine policy and its effects. It's more a matter of cataloguing than testing when it comes to state level stuff. But this is in many ways even more useful because now we can show evidence for all levels of persecution, state and personal. Any state policies or advertisements that help promote it as an identity can in fact now even be tied to causing personal level grief also. We already have that evidence of state discrimination

They were wrong to ignore the state discrimination (and to propose more of it even in the discussion), but we've at least got some interesting data here.

1 year ago
1 score