that might seem like a reasonable position to take, but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts. some did original research on the matter, some presented evidence to support their case. but pressure groups deliberately label any and all such cases as "holocaust deniers", to avoid any debate on the matter.

but why? even if (as I believe) most of the official narrative about the holocaust is correct, do you seriously think there are no accidental inaccuracies? no intentional fabrications? based on just what you've seen since 2020, do you really trust the official narrative, on anything?

take a step back and look what happened here. this is a thread about Alex Jones getting annihilated by a preposterous court decision, that was only possible because people simply accept the narrative of AJ being some great nondescript evil. why is he so bad? don't ask, don't care, he just is, now get me my guillotine. and in this very thread you just dismissed a large group of people who range from genuine scumbags to the simply curious to unpopular researchers who are operating in good faith, as "idiots who deny atrocities". that's something worth reflecting upon.

that might seem like a reasonable position to take, but dig a little deeper and you'd realize that many people labelled as "holocaust deniers" just questioned some specific numbers and concepts. some did original research on the matter, some presented evidence to support their case. but pressure groups deliberately label any and all such cases as "holocaust deniers", to avoid any debate on the matter.

but why? even if (as I believe) most of the official narrative about the holocaust is correct, do you seriously think there are no accidental inaccuracies? no intentional fabrications? based on just what you've seen since 2020, do you really trust the official narrative, on anything?

take a step back and look what happened here. this is a thread about Alex Jones getting annihilated by a preposterous court decision, that was only possible because people simply accept the narrative of AJ being some great nondescript evil. why is he so bad? don't ask, don't care, he just is, now get me my guillotine. and in this very thread you just dismissed a large group of people who range from genuine scumbags to the simply curious to unpopular researchers who are operating in good faith, as "idiots who deny atrocities". that's something worth reflecting upon.