Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Putin's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and want to go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently including some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really somehow failed to notice.

Also https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15JnU9dOZ6/x/c/4Oeyr0j0m1f

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Putin's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and want to go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently including some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

Also https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15JnU9dOZ6/x/c/4Oeyr0j0m1f

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and want to go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently including some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

Also https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15JnU9dOZ6/x/c/4Oeyr0j0m1f

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and want to go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently including some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and want to go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, even with a suitably low yield - unless, again, they're totally crazy and go big).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike, with a suitably low yelield unless, again, they're totally crazy).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile fired from Russian territory rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile rather than a bomb (presumably, assuming they're not totally insane, a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile rather than a bomb (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Zmiinyi Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile rather than a bomb (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, or just Snake Island for that matter, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile rather than a bomb (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror attack), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using an air-launched cruise missile rather than a bomb (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends, from Australia to Japan) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends) can punish Russia. We even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO (and friends) can punish Russia. Iwe even do it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO can punish Russia. It even does it right now if you really failed to notice.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

Of course NATO can punish Russia. It even does it right now.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons (and everything else but these are high priority), and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straight up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike).

But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's all "fuck the optics I'm going in" and does a straigh up terror bombing), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably a very low yield warhead on some sort of isolated military target, unless Russia's "fuck the optics I'm going in"), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile (presumably very low yield warhead on some sort of military target), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile(s), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile(s), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat in public because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile(s), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat because they can't criticize the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile(s), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently includes some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat because they can't critizice the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber, using air-launched cruise missile(s), or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently include some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat because they can't critizice the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently include some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the comically nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat because they can't critizice the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Not "now", but to thwart the (potential, hypothetical) nuclear attack.

It can be a bomber or it can be something else (you can even use an artillery gun to conduct a nuclear strike). But the Americans have all sorts of intelligence tracking the Russian nuclear weapons, and that's apparently include some kind of a mole on the very top of Russian leadership (people like to half joke about the nervous SVR chief Naryshkin, or General Shoigu whom the Russians love to scapegoat because they can't critizice the Supreme Leader).

2 years ago
1 score