I'm reasonably certain
OK, so you are not absolutely certain. That is a good sign at least.
based on both the circumstantial evidence and the actual evidence that has begun to accumulate.
To be clear, that vaccinations are a leading cause of death? And that they actually kill more than they save? Or they could do so in some select demographics, which is a claim that is less strange.
The most significant piece of circumstantial evidence is the fact that the spike in excess deaths across the developed world did not occur in 2020, when Covid was supposedly at its worst, but only really began in the latter half of 2021, after the mass vaccination drives.
Is it impossible that this was due to the delta wave, combined with more places opening up?
Now, let us suppose that this is correct. Would this mean that every single one of the respective vaccine cause so many deaths, even though the underlying technologies are completely different? Even if one were to accept that mRNA is a dangerous new technology (which is not that implausible), why would traditional vaccines cause the exact same number of deaths?
But if the traditional vaccines are not as lethal, why have China and Russia, with their own vaccines, not exposed Pfizer's lethality and dealt a body blow to Western credibility? It's the moon-landing argument: if it were fake, surely the USSR would have exposed it.
Here is a small selection of the hard evidence:
As skeptical as I am of the regime, I'm also skeptical of randomly gathered information by people who do not know the subject, to people who do not know the subject (me). For this to be covered up would require the complicity of too many people. I understand this sounds a little like the NPC argument "the experts say X, they must be right". But I think extraordinary claims do require extraordinary evidence.
I'm reasonably certain
OK, so you are not absolutely certain. That is a good sign at least.
based on both the circumstantial evidence and the actual evidence that has begun to accumulate.
To be clear, that vaccinations are a leading cause of death? And that they actually kill more than they save? Or they could do so in some select demographics, which is a claim that is less strange.
The most significant piece of circumstantial evidence is the fact that the spike in excess deaths across the developed world did not occur in 2020, when Covid was supposedly at its worst, but only really began in the latter half of 2021, after the mass vaccination drives.
Is it impossible that this was due to the delta wave, combined with more places opening up?
Now, let us suppose that this is correct. Would this mean that every single one of the respective vaccine cause so many deaths, even though the underlying technologies are completely different? Even if one were to accept that mRNA is a dangerous new technology (which is not that implausible), why would traditional vaccines cause the exact same number of deaths?
But if the traditional vaccines are not as lethal, why have China and Russia, with their own vaccines, not exposed Pfizer's lethality and dealt a body blow to Western credibility? It's the moon-landing argument: if it were fake, surely the USSR would have exposed it.
Here is a small selection of the hard evidence:
As skeptical as I am of the regime, I'm also skeptical of randomly gathered information . For this to be covered up would require the complicity of too many people. I understand this sounds a little like the NPC argument "the experts say X, they must be right". But I think extraordinary claims do require extraordinary evidence.