While Imp's views are extreme, he does have a point - a lot of problems in society are due to simps and cucks who can't say 'no' to women because they worship women. The view you're promoting is not effectively any different - "we can't say 'no' to women because that will mean there are no more babies!".

The reality, of course, is that women, in general, have at least as much of a drive to have babies as men do. Men need to be willing to stand up and say 'no' when the deal is bad, because that's the only way to make women offer a different deal. Yet your view promotes the opposite, all the while we have articles like the OP telling women that "they don't need to have children or get married". What this leads to is (1) women being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off not saying 'no') (2) men not being willing to say 'no' to women (even if they would be better off saying 'no') and (3) a shit show when men are treated terribly, women are treated like angels, and society collapses because all the children are raised in broken families.

While Imp's views are extreme, he does have a point - a lot of problems in society are due to simps and cucks who can't say 'no' to women because they worship women. The view you're promoting is not effectively any different - "we can't say 'no' to women because that will mean there are no more babies!".

The reality, of course, is that women, in general, have at least as much of a drive to have babies as men do. Men need to be willing to stand up and say 'no' when the deal is bad, because that's the only way to make women offer a different deal. Yet your view promotes the opposite, all the while we have articles like the OP telling women that "they don't need to have children or get married". What this leads to is (1) women being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off not saying 'no') (2) men not being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off saying 'no') and (3) a shit show when men are treated terribly, women are treated like angels, and society collapses because all the children are raised in broken families.

While Imp's views are extreme, he does have a point - a lot of problems in society are due to simps and cucks who can't say 'no' to women because of they worship women. The view you're promoting is not effectively any different - "we can't say 'no' to women because that will mean there are no more babies!".

The reality, of course, is that women, in general, have at least as much of a drive to have babies as men do. Men need to be willing to stand up and say 'no' when the deal is bad, because that's the only way to make women offer a different deal. Yet your view promotes the opposite, all the while we have articles like the OP telling women that "they don't need to have children or get married". What this leads to is (1) women being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off not saying 'no') (2) men not being willing to say 'no' to men (even if they would be better off saying 'no') and (3) a shit show when men are treated terribly, women are treated like angels, and society collapses because all the children are raised in broken families.