The use of violence is a popular topic but I've yet to hear anyone describe the framework under which violence would be employed.

It seems like most people think we should be picking up our guns and walking down to the school board meeting and demanding changes at gun point. This would end in absolute disaster for everyone involved, and whose to say the new changes, even if implemented successfully, could even be considered legitimate?

The sad truth is, when the country is filled with corrupt and degenerate people, we get a corrupt and degenerate government. A tiny number of armed individuals storming into local government offices and demanding changes is the epitome of illegitimate government.

No, in order for violence to be employed justly with the goal of creating something better than what we have now, there needs to be a very clear framework and justification that is morally and logically sound. I've yet to hear anyone bring forward such a framework.

The use of violence is a popular topic but I've yet to hear anyone describe the framework under which violence would be employed.

It seems like most people think we should be picking up our guns and walking down to the school board meeting and demanding changes at gun point. This would end in absolute disaster for everyone involved, and whose to say the new changes, even if implemented successfully, could even be considered legitimate?

The sad truth is, when the country is filled with corrupt and degenerate people, we get a corrupt and degenerate government. A tiny number of armed individuals storming into local government offices and demanding changes is the epitome of illegitimate government.

No, in order for violence to be employed justly in order to create something better than we have now, there needs to be a very clear framework and justification that is morally and logically sound. I've yet to hear anyone bring forward such a framework.