I love the "No evidence has emerged of this thing" line they always trot out to dismiss any claims they don't like. I started noticing it after the election, when the media collectively and conveniently forgot the difference between "evidence" and "proof", so they could use lack of evidence as evidence of lack in illogical factchecks that somehow worked with idiot NPCs. These NPCs will gleefully parrot the latest "Baseless! Without Evidence! Conspiracy Theory!" factcheck from The Cathedral, when any of us paying attention know the FBI wouldn't touch Hunter's stash with a 10 foot pole. The agents searching Giuliani's house looked through those hard drives like they weren't there, muttering "It doesn't look like anything to me" as they rifled through and bagged Rudy's personal possessions.
My favorite example of that was when - in a rare move for him - Barr put down his bucket of extra crispy chicken, and bravely got out in front of the stolen election claims to tell the media that he'd found no evidence of fraud. It was literally weeks after the election. It was days after Amistad Project brought out the truck driver whose truck of ballots was stolen. But Barr figured out an amazing lifehack - Can't have evidence if there's no investigation! <rollsafe.gif>
I don't know the nature of the "year-long investigation" here but why should that convince anyone? They aren't just politically biased - they are criminally incompetent. 4chan autists could find out more about Hunter and Joe's links to China in one day than federal agents would ever discover in a year.
I love the "No evidence has emerged of this thing" line they always trot out to dismiss any claims they don't like. I started noticing it after the election, when the media collectively and conveniently forgot the difference between "evidence" and "proof", so they could use lack of evidence as evidence of lack in illogical factchecks that somehow worked with idiot NPCs. These NPCs will gleefully parrot the latest "Baseless! Without Evidence! Conspiracy Theory!" factcheck from The Cathedral, when any of us paying attention know the FBI wouldn't touch Hunter's stash with a 10 foot pole. The agents searching Giuliani's house looked through those hard drives like they weren't there, muttering "It doesn't look like anything to me" as they rifled through and bagged Rudy's personal possessions.
My favorite example of that was when - in a rare move for him - Barr put down his bucket of extra crispy chicken, and bravely got out in front of the stolen election claims to tell the new media that he'd found no evidence of fraud. It was literally weeks after the election. It was days after Amistad Project brought out the truck driver whose truck of ballots was stolen. But Barr figured out an amazing lifehack - Can't have evidence if there's no investigation! <rollsafe.gif>
I don't know the nature of the "year-long investigation" here but why should that convince anyone? They aren't just politically biased - they are criminally incompetent. 4chan autists could find out more about Hunter and Joe's links to China in one day than federal agents would ever discover in a year.
I love the "No evidence has emerged of this thing" line they always trot out to dismiss any claims they don't like. I started noticing it after the election, when the media collectively and conveniently forgot the difference between "evidence" and "proof", so they could use lack of evidence as evidence of lack in illogical factchecks that somehow worked with idiot NPCs. These NPCs will gleefully parrot the latest "Baseless! Without Evidence! Conspiracy Theory!" factcheck from The Cathedral, when any of us paying attention know the FBI wouldn't touch Hunter's stash with a 10 foot pole. The agents searching Giuliani's house looked through those hard drives like they weren't there, muttering "It doesn't look like anything to me" as they rifled through and bagged Rudy's personal possessions.
My favorite example of that was when - in a rare move for him - Barr put down his bucket of extra crispy chicken, and bravely got out in front of the stolen election claims to tell the new media that he'd found no evidence of fraud. It was literally weeks after the election. It was days after Amistad Project brought out the truck driver whose truck of ballots was stolen. But Barr figured out an amazing lifehack - Can't have evidence if there's no investigation! <rollsafe.gif>
I don't know the nature of the FBI's "year-long investigation" here but why should that convince anyone? They aren't just politically biased - they are criminally incompetent. 4chan autists could find out more about Hunter and Joe's links to China in one day than FBI agents would ever discover in a year.