You may think it's misleading, but I think it's relevant. It's absolutely related to the content of the article. He does say on the caption that the image is a work of fiction made by a fan of such dissolutions, not that it was part of that specific paper. Following the image link, it was used on the Ukrainian version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_Russia which presents many hypothetical situations where Russia could be broken up. The paper is one such hypothetical situation.

Yes it's obvious that the writer is biased on the side of Russia. I don't really care.

from one of his articles...That looks antisemitic

So what? He's on Russia's side in the war, and Putin is at least pretending to be doing this to defend Jews.

You may think it's misleading, but I think it's relevant. It's absolutely related to the content of the article. He does say on the caption that the image is a work of fiction made by a fan of such dissolutions, not that it was part of that specific paper. Following the image link, it was used on the Ukrainian version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_Russia which presents many hypothetical situations where Russia could be broken up. The paper is one such hypothetical situation.

Yes it's obvious that the writer is biased on the side of Russia. I don't really care.

from one of his articles...That looks antisemitic

So what?