Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all. In accepting her father's killer, the woman preserves her father's DNA for the ages. He may be spinning in his grave, but that actual tangible part of him that exists, exists. The same cannot be said for the father of a woman who resists the new champions. His DNA is obliterated for eternity.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man. Or hope that your daughter puts out.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all. In accepting her father's killer, the woman preserves her father's DNA for the ages. He may be spinning in his grave, but that actual tangible part of him that exists, exists. The same cannot be said for the father of a woman who resists the new champions. His DNA is obliterated for eternity.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all. In accepting her father's killer, the woman preserves her father's DNA for the ages. He may be spinning in his grave, but that actual tangible part of him that exists, exists. The same cannot be said for the father of a woman who resists the new champions. His DNA is obliterated for eternity.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all. In accepting her father's killer, the woman preserves her father's DNA for the ages. He may be spinning in his grave, but that actual tangible part of him that exists, exists. The same cannot be said for the father of a woman who resists the new champions.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all. In accepting her father's killer, the woman preserves her father's DNA for the ages.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

the way you look at women is about as fucking looney as Imp gets, and frankly, says something about your own sense of security in relationships.

I'm going to repeat: I don't think this behavior among women is bad or illogical. It is the best option available to them. The alternative is that their genes - and thus those of their tribe - do not pass on at all.

Women have evolved to make the best of bad situations, and they do so to the betterment of all mankind, by removing weak men.

My post essentially says: Stop being a weak man.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.

Or Mary Jemison.

Funny, I almost considered mentioning Boudicca in my post as an example of why resistance is a bad idea for women, and why only a stupid woman would entertain it.

You are looking at tiny instances, brief moments moments, infinitesimal windows in time.

The matrilineal mtDNA and Patrilineal Y-DNA of populations doesn't lie. When ancient cultures/populations die out (read: get conquered by another), the mtDNA keeps on trucking, and the YDNA fades away.

If you'd prefer your own style of looking at instances, though - Mohammed and Aisha.

Or Ghengis Khan and everyone.