I am firm believer that women shit test entire nations just as they shit test overly nice boyfriends.

Women crave male dominance to the point that they would rather stand by and watch a rival tribe murder their fathers and brothers and husbands and sons than live with men who show less dominance.

We see this behavior in chimps, we see this behavior all throughout human history - whole towns of men get conquered and killed, and before their bodies are even cold, their women are being impregnated by the men who killed them. The women have orgasms, and then they raise the children according to the customs of of the conquering men, completely and utterly forgetting their weak, dead fathers and brothers and husbands and sons, watching the children of their murderers play on top of their unmarked graves.

That has happened all throughout human history since time immemorial. Women have no loyalty to anything other than power.

Hitler famously had little time for, and perhaps little understanding of women. Maybe if he'd understood them better he wouldn't have wanted them dead - he would have been much better served by murdering their men, then putting their women in up in nice houses where they can be fucked. Perhaps houses with a view of the yards where their new SS boyfriends murder their old families as a show of dominance.

It sounds ridiculous and obscene, like it couldn't possibly work. These women would surely choose death, - either fighting or by suicide, over this humiliation and betrayal of their families, right? Any man would.

Wrong. History shows, time and time again, women choose to breed with their conquerors, and raise their children.

As repulsive as it seems, we shouldn't even be mad at them for it. Evolutionarily, it makes perfect sense for them to do so - better half of our genes pass on than none at all. They are unironically clawing back a small genetic victory where their men failed completely.

We have only ourselves to blame, for lacking the collective will to do the right thing.

I am firm believer that women shit test entire nations just as they shit test overly nice boyfriends.

Women crave male dominance to the point that they would rather stand by and watch a rival tribe murder their fathers and brothers and husbands and sons than live with men who show less dominance.

We see this behavior in chimps, we see this behavior all throughout human history - whole towns of men get conquered and killed, and before their bodies are even cold, their women are being impregnated by the men who killed them. The women have orgasms, and then they raise the children according to the customs of of the conquering men, completely and utterly forgetting their weak, dead fathers and brothers and husbands and sons, watching the children of their murderers play on top of their unmarked graves.

That has happened all throughout human history since time immemorial. Women have no loyalty to anything other than power.

Hitler famously had little time for, and perhaps little understanding of women. Maybe if he'd understood them better he wouldn't have wanted them dead - he would have been much better served by murdering their men, then putting their women in up in nice houses where they can be fucked. Perhaps houses with a view of the yards where their new SS boyfriends murder their old families as a show of dominance.

It sounds ridiculous and obscene, like it couldn't possibly work. These women would surely choose death, - either fighting or by suicide, over this humiliation and betrayal of their families, right? Any man would.

Wrong. History shows, time and time again, women choose to breed with their conquerors, and raise their children.

As repulsive as it seems, we shouldn't even be mad at them for it. Evolutionarily, it makes perfect sense for them to do so - better half of our genes pass on than none at all. They are unironically clawing back a small genetic victory where their men failed completely.

I am firm believer that women shit test entire nations just as they shit test overly nice boyfriends.

Women crave male dominance to the point that they would rather stand by and watch a rival tribe murder their fathers and brothers and husbands and sons than live with men who show less dominance.

We see this behavior in chimps, we see this behavior all throughout human history - whole towns of men get conquered and killed, and before their bodies are even cold, their women are being impregnated by the men who killed them. The women have orgasms, and then they raise the children according to the customs of of the conquering men, completely and utterly forgetting their weak, dead fathers and brothers and husbands and sons, watching the children of their murderers play on top of their unmarked graves.

That has happened all throughout human history since time immemorial. Women have no loyalty to anything other than power.

Hitler famously had little time for, and perhaps little understanding of women. Maybe if he'd understood them better he wouldn't have wanted them dead - he would have been much better served by murdering their men, then putting their women in up in nice houses where they can be fucked. Perhaps houses with a view of the yards where their new SS boyfriends murder their old families as a show of dominance.

It sounds ridiculous and obscene, like it couldn't possibly work. These women would surely choose death, - either fighting or by suicide, over this humiliation and betrayal of their families, right? Any man would.

Wrong. History shows, time and time again, women choose to breed with their conquerors, and raise their children.

As repulsive as it seems, we shouldn't even be mad at them for it. Evolutionarily, it makes perfect sense for them to do so - better half of our genes pass on than none at all.