Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it desperately. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

Go and demand Ukraine just give their food to be sold by Moscow. Again, like in the 1930s. Time is a flat circle.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BECAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM. Is it in large enough letters for you to finally comprehend?

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something the Ukrainians actually shouldn't have listened to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it desperately. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

Go and demand Ukraine just give their food to be sold by Moscow. Again, like in the 1930s. Time is a flat circle.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something the Ukrainians actually shouldn't have listened to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

Go and demand Ukraine just give their food to be sold by Moscow. Again, like in the 1930s. Time is a flat circle.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something the Ukrainians actually shouldn't have listened to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

Go and demand Ukraine just give their food to Moscow to be exported. Again, like in the 1930s. Time is a flat circle

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something the Ukrainians actually shouldn't have listened to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something the Ukrainians actually shouldn't have listened to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something they actually shouldn't listen to the Americans about. Because the Americans believed Russia can be a friend and a partner, because they're so stupid and naive in their own ways.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway they only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea. While THERE IS the Russian Navy blockade of the food they didn't steal yet.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something they actually shouldn't listen to the Americans about.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

What the fuck? When ever it happened when a country chose to starve large swathes of Africa and also parts of Asia (or any other continents), all neutral countries, to death, just to punish an unrelated country in another continent? When this "legitimate war aim" happened? Is this the "denazification of Africa" now?

No is physically (by force) blockading exports of Russian food to the countries needing it despertaely. Only in your weird mind.

Americans can tell anyone not to buy the STOLEN food, they don't enforce it.

They're not like the police who will raid you if you conciously buy from someone you know was stolen from someone who murdered and robbed his neighbour. (And you think it's now just the robber's property. Because you do, calling it "Russian".)

But anyway hey only ask and that is all. Theres no US Navy fucking blockading the sea.

I fucking told you the Americans tried to make them take Yanuk's own compromise offer AND FAILED BRCAUSE THE UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION DIDN'T LISTEN TO THEM.

This is a reccuring theme, the Ukrainians just not listening to Americans. Even if it the. Bites them in the ass badly.

They were dismantling the old Soviet labs, just like they dismantled/blown up/transferred to Russia (with Americans paying for it) all of nuclear weapons and anything related to them earlier in the decades long process of the American disarmament of Ukraine.

And which is something they actually shouldn't listen to the Americans about.

2 years ago
1 score