There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of immutable topical focus on incel/mtgow over such an extended period coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if you could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of immutable topical focus on incel/mtgow over such an extended period coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck projection crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances that your immutable topical focus over such an extended period comes from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched and I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances that your immutable topical focus over such an extended period comes from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances that your immutable topical focus over such an extended period comes from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of your immutable topical focus over an extended period of coming from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a shill.

I can accept for instance, about myself, that I am eccentric. But am I laser-focused on a static agendized nuture/neg dialogue tree? You would have a hard time convincing me you are genuinely this mentally ill about women and NOTHING else. The chances of your focus from a casual, natural user are just a joke.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.

There is a possibility I made a fool out of myself: that you may actually be RealDrJester. I didn't pay attention to the style of prose being so similar down to the occasional use of bullet points. I only tagged to rib on the gatekeeping, agenda overlap, and literal cuck crutch.

So there I was, telling some sand dude that babies are important, and he replies "you've said nothing of value". The record scratched I felt the need to explain how I got into this situation. Tl;dr, was baby from vagana. Maybe you can relate.

In all seriousness, maybe somewhere in the quantum realm there is a plane where it makes sense to call this "nothing of value", but I doubt it. Okay I lied, now I'm being serious: your focus on hating women is anal retentive misdirection of sexual failure (tl;dr your ass retains dick), or you are a literally a paid shill.

Speaking of quantum physics (just kidding), I've been really curious about bots lately. I think I've proven I'm not a bot, at least not one programmed to blend in the way it should. But any bot can play mad libs with a few keywords and slap ill-fitting logical fallacies onto [women(bad)+linkheading], so I'd like to ask you for an easy proof. Like if could incorporate the phrase "and now I do this every day because I never got over her" in your reply that would seal the deal. Thanks.