Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing my time at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that the white nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our own diseased organs.

I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing my time at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that the white nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing my time at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not socrates and I am not actually open to a debate. I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am socrates and I am not actually open to a debate, I am airing a grievance, and having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not actually open to a debate and am airing grievance, having said everything I have to say on the matter I will only compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote a policy of internal division and weakness that amount to soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not actually open to a debate and am airing grievance, having said everything I have to say on the matter and I will just compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white females and that they are absolutely necessary for the race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, but one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological (professional?) veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not actually open to a debate and am airing grievance, having said everything I have to say on the matter and I will just compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you promote a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white female and that they are absolutely necessary for our race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, they are one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological or profession veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not actually open to a debate and am airing grievance, having said everything I have to say on the matter and I will just compulsively insult you.

Somehow I doubt that would be the case. Do you not?

I know I'm throwing socrates at a wall by going into it, but is there anything short of directly attacking the weaker sex that a politician can do to please you? I agree the country has been grievously injured by suffrage but I think you suffer a GRAND demoralization delusion in regarding feminism as a cause and not an effect.

You have to realize that your nuclear group includes white female and that they are absolutely necessary for our race to survive. You have to realize that women are not an external force bearing down on you, they are one of our diseased internal organs. I say "have to realize" as a sign of respect for intelligence behind the ideological or profession veneer of your campaign against young men successfully breeding. It's not a compliment though, it's just that intelligence and objective morality are two separate things that I judge separately. It means in my opinion that you promote soft genocide, that you have the capacity to comprehend so, and that you intentionally misrepresent your disposition to advance this.

There's no need to go on about how woefully inaccurate I am and how women are bad as it will just contribute to the worthless upvoted/downvoted comment chain effect. I am not actually open to a debate and am airing grievance, having said everything I have to say on the matter and I will just compulsively insult you.