He's asking for something they are hypocritical about, not your personal projection of the likelyhood of sexual success. That is ad hominem that only reflects on your personal perspective.

It's an answerable question, it is not a gotcha. An answer would reflect on ConPro though. One's personal disbelief regarding the one's ability to get a date does not really apply to the question.

Another layer: failing to accomplish a thing not equivalent to taking a stance against that which you failed to do. So even if the experience of ConPro users did reflect your projection, would not be a logical answer.

He's asking for something they are hypocritical about, not your personal projection of the likelyhood of sexual success. That is ad hominem that only reflects on your personal perspective.

It's an answerable question, it is not a gotcha. An answer would reflect on ConPro though. One's personal disbelief regarding the one's ability to get a date does not really apply to the question.

He's asking for something they are hypocritical about, not your personal projection of sexual problems. That is ad hominem and only reflects on your personal perspective of the world.

It's an answerable question, it is not a gotcha. But an answer would reflect on ConPro. Your personal disbelief regarding the general likelihood of a man's sexual success does not really apply to the question.

I mean other than projection and ad hominem fallacies. I.e. something they are hypocritical about, but actually.