Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

their girlfriend won't fuck a guy who is interested in other guys

That's a great point, and it applies to everything those retards advocate in the gender and masculinity area. Just replace "is interested in other guys" with whatever they're advocating for at the moment. They act like society requires that every man be a hyper-masculine reincarnation of Chad Thundercock and brutally oppresses them if they aren't. While no one respects a beta cuck, being one is actually encouraged by society and they get by just fine judging by how many of them there are and how much they're rewarded in a number of fields. The real downside to being the soy soaked version of the ideal man feminists promote is that women aren't attracted to that so beta cucks don't get laid. They rail against "toxic masculinity" constantly but it's women who reward it by putting out for men who display that behavior. So if they want to "redefine masculinity" they're free to do so. They just won't get anyone who wants to get laid on board with it. If they don't like it their real grievance is with women. But I'm sure everyone here can guess what would happen we went into that shithole and said women are the real reason that the thing they call "toxic masculinity" persists.

2 years ago
15 score
Reason: Original

their girlfriend won't fuck a guy who is interested in other guys

That's a great point, and it applies to everything those retards advocate in the gender and masculinity area. Just replace "is interested in other guys" with whatever they're advocating for at the moment. They act like society requires that every man to be a hyper-masculine reincarnation of Chad Thundercock and brutally oppresses them if they aren't. While no one respects a beta cuck, being one is actually encouraged by society and they get by just fine judging by how many of them there are and how much they're rewarded in a number of fields. The real downside to being the soy soaked version of the ideal man feminists promote is that women aren't attracted to that so beta cucks don't get laid. They rail against "toxic masculinity" constantly but it's women who reward it by putting out for men who display that behavior. So if they want to "redefine masculinity" they're free to do so. They just won't get anyone who wants to get laid on board with it. If they don't like it their real grievance is with women. But I'm sure everyone here can guess what would happen we went into that shithole and said women are the real reason that the thing they call "toxic masculinity" persists.

2 years ago
1 score