No, I've been talking about the same thing this entire time. Some people don't meet the requirements for a university course for whatever reason. As long as they spend the time and effort to legitimately meet the requirements, they should be accepted. I'm not talking about accepting them when they don't meet the standards. I'm talking about accepting them after they've proved they meet the standards.

They're rejected > they take a year to meet the standards > they're accepted the next year after meeting the standards

Don't enroll them if they don't meet the standards. If they do meet the requirements, even if they take a program somewhere else to do it, why the fuck shouldn't they?

No, I've been talking about the same thing this entire time. Some people don't meet the requirements for a university course for whatever reason. As long as they spend the time and effort to legitimately meet the requirements, they should be accepted. I'm not talking about accepting them when they don't meet the standards. I'm talking about accepting them after they've proved they meet the standards.

They're rejected > they take a year to meet the standards > they're accepted the next year after meeting the standards

Don't enroll them if they don't. If they do meet the requirements, even if they take a program somewhere else to do it, why the fuck shouldn't they?

No, I've been talking about the same thing this entire time. Some people don't meet the requirements for a university course for whatever reason. As long as they spend the time and effort to legitimately meet the requirements, they should be accepted. I'm not talking about accepting them when they don't know. I'm talking about accepting them after they've proved they meet the standards.

Don't enroll them if they don't. If they do meet the requirements, even if they take a program somewhere else to do it, why the fuck shouldn't they?