It's hard. This is a parallel societies type thing.

First, most people don't know about it, so Informing people about it, and that it was done behind their backs using the virus (and their handling of it/everyone) as an "opportunity" to force this through. Second is building a lack of trust in the people in the planning and enforcement of this: Canada's banks all use it, and they just froze people's bank accounts. The WEF has talked about how great it was having no people on the street in 2020, and that there should be a climate lockdown every two years.

One of the problems is that some of what the Klaus and the WEF talk about is insane. They're fully intent on realizing it, and have already started, but it'll take time to get people ready to accept it, while also countering the "Great Narrative" that they've started.

Actual consequences are the most important thing. Many politicians only changed their stances when they started really worrying about reelection. Banks might think more when people pull out, but CEO remuneration is already tied to ESG. When that money goes elsewhere, like to support those against ESG is where it's really important.

It's hard. This is a parallel societies type thing.

First, most people don't know about it, so Informing people about it, and that it was done behind their backs. Second is building a lack of trust in the people in the planning and enforcement of this: Canada's banks all use it, and they just froze people's bank accounts. Many officials and "elite" were pushing for the restrictions in the past two years, and the WEF has talked about how great it was having no people on the street in 2020, and that there should be a climate lockdown every two years.

One of the problems is that some of what the Klaus and the WEF talk about is insane. They're fully intent on realizing it, and have already started, but it'll take time to get people ready to accept it, while also countering the "Great Narrative" that they've started.

Actual consequences are the most important thing. Many politicians only changed their stances when they started really worrying about reelection. Banks might think more when people pull out, but CEO remuneration is already tied to ESG. When that money goes elsewhere, like to support those against ESG is where it's really important.