Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The first scene has a woman lecturing her son on privilege, at least she soon dies. Then there is a big section in the middle where the main character "nobleman" blubbers while apologizing for the British Empire.

This is an anti government message about common decency. The POWs in cages were themselves Europeans.

It also mentions that the British government runs spy agencies that cause more problems than they solve which is a critique on modern spy states. Its anti military as well (based).

There is a mary sue woman who is sassy to men and "THE BEST" at arbitrary skills that are useful to the plot, at the end of the movie she is dressed like a dyke larping steampunk.

The only noteworthy female character in the movie is Gemma Arterton and she never fights hand to hand with anyone.

The plot is a convoluted fictional tying together of the historical events surrounding WW1 that I didn't really bother following. The action was OK but forgettable. The only standout was the dance fight scene with Rasputin, who was the only interesting character so of course they had to make him a wierdo sodomite.

This is where the plot faulters but its overall intention is to show that the globalist (((banking cartel))) were behind WW1 and WW2.

Overall it was worse than Kingsman 2 which was just barely watchable.

Yes its worse than before but it isnt leftist in any way. In fact its anti government. There is a scene at the end which shows the villain assembling Lenin and Hitler together to make up the extremes setting the stage for WW2.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The first scene has a woman lecturing her son on privilege, at least she soon dies. Then there is a big section in the middle where the main character "nobleman" blubbers while apologizing for the British Empire.

This is an anti government message about common decency. Noticew the POWs were also caucasian. It was a reference to the Boer war.

It also mentions that the British government runs spy agencies that cause more problems than they solve which is a critique on modern spy states. Its anti military as well (based).

There is a mary sue woman who is sassy to men and "THE BEST" at arbitrary skills that are useful to the plot, at the end of the movie she is dressed like a dyke larping steampunk.

The only noteworthy female character in the movie is Gemma Arterton and she never fights hand to hand with anyone.

The plot is a convoluted fictional tying together of the historical events surrounding WW1 that I didn't really bother following. The action was OK but forgettable. The only standout was the dance fight scene with Rasputin, who was the only interesting character so of course they had to make him a wierdo sodomite.

This is where the plot faulters but its overall intention is to show that the globalist (((banking cartel))) were behind WW1 and WW2.

Overall it was worse than Kingsman 2 which was just barely watchable.

Yes its worse than before but it isnt leftist in any way. In fact its anti government. There is a scene at the end which shows the villain assembling Lenin and Hitler together to make up the extremes setting the stage for WW2.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The first scene has a woman lecturing her son on privilege, at least she soon dies. Then there is a big section in the middle where the main character "nobleman" blubbers while apologizing for the British Empire.

This is an anti government message about common decency. Noticew the POWs were also caucasian. It was a reference to the Boer war.

It also mentions that the British government runs spy agencies that cause more problems than they solve which is a critique on modern spy states.

There is a mary sue woman who is sassy to men and "THE BEST" at arbitrary skills that are useful to the plot, at the end of the movie she is dressed like a dyke larping steampunk.

The only noteworthy female character in the movie is Gemma Arterton and she never fights hand to hand with anyone.

The plot is a convoluted fictional tying together of the historical events surrounding WW1 that I didn't really bother following. The action was OK but forgettable. The only standout was the dance fight scene with Rasputin, who was the only interesting character so of course they had to make him a wierdo sodomite.

This is where the plot faulters but its overall intention is to show that the globalist (((banking cartel))) were behind WW1 and WW2.

Overall it was worse than Kingsman 2 which was just barely watchable.

Yes its worse than before but it isnt leftist in any way. In fact its anti government.

2 years ago
1 score