He has little patience for arguments about whether research is good for people (such as "Are homosexual people hurt or harmed by research on the genetics of sexual orientation?"), preferring instead to dwell on whether scientific findings are true.

An actual scientist? No wonder his results track with observable reality.

There's a long section where the author goes to great pains to describe Michael Jackson without mentioning his name.

He has little patience for arguments about whether research is good for people (such as "Are homosexual people hurt or harmed by research on the genetics of sexual orientation?"), preferring instead to dwell on whether scientific findings are true.

An actual scientist? No wonder his results track with observable reality.