Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.

It is not necessary to be libertine to be libertarian. But the maximum stance a libertarian can take on libertinism is "it's not my thing". Anything less permissive is hypocritical. If you think the libertinism of the individual should be subjugated to higher needs of the community, YOU ARE NOT LIBERTARIAN. Fullstop.

There is no intellectually honest out from that. To be libertarian is to be tolerant of shit you don't like even if you know it harms the community.

AND I SAY THAT fully acknowledging that libertinism is bad for the community. It's a failing of libertarianism, and why we have to move AWAY from libertarianism as a foundation and towards Heinleinism.

Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.

It is not necessary to be libertine to be libertarian. But the maximum stance a libertarian can take on libertinism is "it's not my thing". Anything less permissive is hypocritical. If you think the libertinism of the individual should be subjugated to higher needs of the community, YOU ARE NOT LIBERTARIAN. Fullstop.

There is no intellectually honest out from that. To be libertarian is to be tolerant of shit you don't like even if you know it harms the community.

Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.

It is not necessary to be libertine to be libertarian. But the maximum stance a libertarian can take on libertinism is "it's not my thing". Anything less permissive is hypocritical. If you think the libertinism of the individual should be subjugated to higher needs of the community, YOU ARE NOT LIBERTARIAN. Fullstop.

Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.

It is not necessary to be libertine to be libertarian. But the maximum stance a libertarian can take on libertinism is "it's not my thing". Anything less permissive is hypocritical.

Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.

It is not necessary to be libertine to be libertarian. But the maximum stance a libertarian can take on libertinism is "it's not for me". Anything less permissive is hypocritical.

Because liberty and libertarianism doesn't mean jack if you only mean liberty to do the shit you approve of.

You, and him, are quite literally as bad as Tipper fucking Gore in my eyes.